Early final week, throughout Amazon’s Prime Days, I made a decision to see if the e-tailer had any good offers on over-the-air TV antennas. I used to be appalled by what I discovered.
Searching for “antenna” on Amazon.com revealed itemizing upon itemizing for merchandise with doubtful efficiency claims. In Amazon’s hottest and sponsored outcomes, antenna makers have been promoting unrealistic reception ranges, nonexistent over-the-air channels, and movie high quality that present U.S. broadcast requirements don’t help.
These deceptive claims aren’t simply unhealthy for cord-cutters. They additionally may hurt respectable antenna makers that refuse to get within the muck with much less scrupulous manufacturers. Unless Amazon—or a authorities watchdog—intervene, such a promoting is unlikely to cease anytime quickly.
When I reached out to Amazon for a touch upon my findings, an Amazon spokesperson mentioned “Selling partners are required to provide accurate information about their products to Amazon, and we take action against those that violate our policies and threaten our customer experience. We are investigating these listings now and will take prompt action against any that violate our policies.”
Indeed, the corporate rapidly eliminated lots of the offending listings cited on this story previous to publication. Still, many other offenders remain available, promising unrealistic reception or unavailable channels.
Unrealistic mile ranges
In a seek for “antenna” on Amazon, the highest consequence early final week was a sponsored listing from a vendor known as “TO BE #1.” It’s an indoor flat-panel antenna that claims to “pick up TV signals up to 120 miles away.”
If that appears like an unbelievable vary for an indoor antenna, it’s as a result of it defies the accepted legal guidelines of physics.
Founder and president of Antennas Direct, Richard Schneider, mentioned he doesn’t promise protection past 70 miles even for the corporate’s outside antennas, and that’s assuming “a Kansas farmer living in a two-story house on a flat prairie.” Beyond that distance, the earth’s curvature prevents antennas from persistently choosing up even the strongest broadcast alerts.
Getting the identical reception from an indoor antenna is even tougher, Schneider mentioned, as a result of it should take care of constructing supplies, decrease elevation, and presumably extra obstructions exterior the home. Indoor antennas additionally are typically smaller, so that they have much less room for added antenna arrays, reflectors, and different signal-improving options.
“It’s almost getting ridiculous what some of these range claims are,” Schneider mentioned. “Even under the best circumstances, you would almost never see an 80-mile range out of an indoor antenna. It would be highly unlikely, and if you did it would be inconsistent.”
John Crabill, the chief advertising and marketing officer for Mohu, famous that the dimensions and placement of an antenna matter greater than another issue. For indoor antennas, he mentioned, 60 to 70 miles is the best-case situation, however metallic interference, decrease elevation, outside obstacles, and noise from different wi-fi alerts can all drive reception vary down.
“A claim that a small antenna can suddenly perform twice as well is simply not supported by data and testing,” Crabill mentioned.
On Amazon, antenna makers seem undeterred. Beneath the retailer’s sponsored outcomes, the “Best Seller” itemizing is an indoor antenna from 1byOne that advertises “high performance UHF and VHF reception from up to 80 miles away.” There was a time when 1byOne made extra correct claims about its antenna efficiency—I purchased one in every of its indoor antennas with an marketed 35-mile vary in 2016, and it’s labored nicely—however it appears that evidently puffing up mile-range claims is healthier for enterprise. (The firm, which didn’t reply a request for remark, additionally sells an antenna that advertises 100 miles of coverage.)
Outdoor antennas aren’t exempt from such a promoting both. One of the highest search outcomes on Amazon is an outdoor antenna from Five Star that guarantees “up to 200 miles long range,” and Amazon’s “Top Seller” outside antenna from Vansky guarantees a variety of 150 miles. Even the RCA model is now jumping on the 150-mile-claim bandwagon (RCA additionally didn’t reply to a request for remark).
“It has seriously gotten out of control, especially with all of the flat indoor antennas and cheaply-built outdoor antennas that have flooded the market,” mentioned Joe Bingochea, the president of antenna maker Channel Master. “The fact of the matter is that consumers do not know any better and most times they will buy what is rated to have the best range and features regardless of what is reality.”
Is there any oversight?
How are these mile ranges not clear-cut circumstances of false promoting? For one factor, figuring out mile vary isn’t an actual science given the variables concerned in choosing up a sign. Even respected manufacturers like Channel Master and Antennas Direct are simply estimating based mostly on elements similar to antenna acquire and buyer suggestions, and Schneider acknowledges some uncommon circumstances wherein a buyer has picked up stations greater than 100 miles away. Other manufacturers ,nonetheless, seem to haven’t any qualms about promoting that type of excessive edge case on the field.
“There are some very bad actors, mostly coming out of China, and they don’t seem constrained with the need to tell the truth,” Schneider says.
Mohu’s Crabill additionally suspects that some antenna makers are basing their claims on whether or not stations seem in a channel scan, no matter whether or not they come by clearly.
“We think getting 50 channels but most are pixelated is just fluff, nothing more,” Crabill says. “It’s one of the reasons so many antennas are returned.”
Some antenna makers is perhaps skating by on semantics as nicely. RCA, as an illustration, notes that by “150 mile total range,” it means “up to 70+ miles from the broadcast towers.” In different phrases, when you level the antenna at a tower 70 miles east, after which level the antenna at one other tower 70 miles west, then voila! You have 140 miles of protection (not to mention that the antenna solely faces a method after set up, or that 140 miles remains to be 10 miles in need of what RCA is promoting).
Even when you give these antenna makers the good thing about the doubt on vary claims, they’re arguably stretching the reality about their merchandise in different methods.
While an over-the-air antenna can decide up broadcast channels similar to ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox without spending a dime in excessive definition (outlined as 720p or 1080i), it is not going to present primary cable channels. Even so, Vansky has a picture on its product web page with logos for HGTV, Showtime, and Bravo, all of that are cable channels. An organization known as Signum-Max has photos of Nickelodeon, Discovery, ESPN, and Discovery, none of which can be found over the air. TO BE #1, which has a sponsored itemizing on Amazon, additionally reveals CNN, ESPN, and Fox Business in its advertising and marketing photos.
Some antenna makers additionally promote 4K Ultra HD image high quality, although the present ATSC 1.0 broadcast customary maxes out at 720p or 1080i decision. The next-gen ATSC 3.0 standard will help 4K, and a subset of those antenna makers precisely cut up hairs by saying their merchandise are “4K Ready,” however customers who aren’t following trade broadcast requirements may not perceive the excellence both means.
While these seemingly inaccurate antenna scams have been around for a while, retailers and regulators have proven little curiosity in protecting inflated advertising and marketing claims in examine, whilst antenna use explodes. Neither Channel Master’s Joe Bingochea nor Antennas Direct’s Richard Schneider mentioned they have been conscious of any efforts by Amazon or the Federal Trade Commission to confirm what antenna makers are promising. Neither Amazon nor the FTC responded to requests for remark.
In the meantime, respected antenna makers say they’re shedding enterprise to manufacturers that make investments little in analysis and improvement, but reap the rewards of inflated advertising and marketing. And these results could possibly be spreading past Amazon. Schneider says that one big-box retailer, which he received’t title, has pressured him to revise Antennas Direct’s packaging to higher compete with merchandise that publicize longer mile ranges.
“As a manufacturer, you have a decision to make: How badly do I want to stay on the shelf?” he says.
What you are able to do
In lieu of stronger protections for customers, you possibly can take a couple of steps to keep away from deceptive antenna advertising and marketing:
- Most importantly, ignore any declare of greater than 70-mile vary, even for outside antennas, and don’t count on 60 miles of reception indoors when you’ve got any quantity of obstruction or interference within the space. Antennas that promise extra would possibly nonetheless work at shorter ranges, however they possible received’t get anyplace near what they promote.
- If you’re not sure about which channels broadcast over the air and which require a cable, satellite tv for pc, or streaming TV bundle, the web site TVFool will let you know which channels can be found in your space and the way far-off their broadcast towers are.
- If you need to reward firms for sincere advertising and marketing, purchase an antenna from a good model, similar to Antennas Direct, Channel Master, Mohu, or Winegard. In addition to avoiding the pattern of mile-range inflation, additionally they supply 1-800 numbers to assist type by your antenna points.
- You also can store for antennas from retailers that truly take a stand in opposition to bogus advertising and marketing. Grant Hall, the CEO of networked tuner maker Tablo, advised buying at Solid Signal, and I’ve seen that Best Buy avoids carrying merchandise with unrealistic mile ranges. (Its antenna page factors out that 75 miles is the utmost vary you possibly can count on from a conventional antenna.)
- Finally, you possibly can take a extra activist stance by complaining to the FTC.
Despite what he’s skilled, Schneider hopes that given sufficient time, respected manufacturers will come out forward. He’s already gotten phrase that one retailer has began asking antenna makers to clarify their mile-range methodology, suggesting that retailers is perhaps getting blowback from customers over antennas with doubtful advertising and marketing. And he doesn’t rule out complaining to the FTC himself.
“Karma’s gonna bite these guys in the ass,” he says. “They’re going to get smacked down at some point, because one of these guys is going to go too far.”
Sign up for Jared’s Cord Cutter Weekly newsletter to get this column and different cord-cutting information, insights, and offers delivered to your inbox.