AMD’s RX 6000 graphics playing cards are an inflection level, permitting Team Red to lastly scale up and earn some spots in our roundup of the most effective graphics playing cards. Powered by the RDNA 2 structure, these playing cards include options like ray tracing and tremendous sampling to energy the newest video games.
Now that the entire playing cards are right here, we rounded up every little thing it is advisable to know concerning the newest from Radeon, together with pricing, specs, efficiency, and a bit concerning the cell GPUs.
AMD RX 6000: Price and launch date
There are actually practically a dozen RX 6000 GPUs out there, with the primary playing cards arriving in November 2020 and the final exhibiting up in May 2022. Here are the entire playing cards out there, in addition to their record costs:
RX 6950 XT — $1,100
RX 6900 XT — $1,000
RX 6800 XT — $650
RX 6800 — $580
RX 6750 XT — $550
RX 6700 XT — $480
RX 6650 XT — $400
RX 6600 XT — $380
RX 6600 — $330
RX 6500 XT — $200
RX 6400 — $160
Out of the 11 playing cards within the RX 6000 vary, 10 of them can be found. The solely oddball is the RX 6600 XT, which AMD changed with the RX 6650 XT. That mentioned, we nonetheless discovered a number of RX 6600 XT fashions out there, and though AMD gained’t proceed to supply them, there needs to be some stock for some time.
GPU costs have been extraordinarily excessive, however they’re dropping. And that’s very true for RX 6000 graphics playing cards. Although AMD is now not promoting reference fashions, you could find most third-party playing cards for his or her record worth. Keep in thoughts that third-party playing cards are sometimes somewhat costlier than record worth. The RX 6700 XT, for instance, sells for wherever from $480 to $600 relying on the mannequin you decide up.
Unlike Nvidia’s RTX 30-series graphics playing cards, AMD RX 6000 playing cards are available. At the time of writing, we discovered each mannequin for every card out there at record worth. The solely exception is the RX 6800 XT, which sells for about $100 to $150 above record worth.
AMD RX 6000: Specs
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
AMD has 11 playing cards in its RX 6000 vary, although the RX 6650 XT technically replaces the RX 6600 XT. Compared to Nvidia’s RTX 30-series GPUs, AMD’s playing cards are inclined to run at increased clock speeds and provide extra reminiscence for mid- to high-end playing cards. However, RX 6000 playing cards are extra constrained by reminiscence, utilizing GDDR6 reminiscence as a substitute of the GDDR6X featured on Nvidia’s flagship playing cards.
Cores
Game clock
Memory
Power draw
Price
RX 6950 XT
5,120
2,100MHz
16GB GDDR6
335W
$1,100
RX 6900 XT
5,120
2,015MHz
16GB GDDR6
300W
$1,000
RX 6800 XT
4,608
2,015MHz
16GB GDDR6
300W
$650
RX 6800
3,840
1,815MHz
16GB GDDR6
250W
$580
RX 6750 XT
2,560
2,495MHz
12GB GDDR6
250W
$550
RX 6700 XT
2,560
2,424MHz
12GB GDDR6
230W
$480
RX 6650 XT
2,048
2,410MHz
8GB GDDR6
176W
$400
RX 6600 XT
2,048
2,359MHz
8GB GDDR6
160W
$380
RX 6600
1,792
2,044MHz
8GB GDDR6
132W
$330
RX 6500 XT
1,024
2,610MHz
4GB GDDR6
107W
$200
RX 6400
768
2,039MHz
4GB GDDR6
53W
$160
On the flip facet, AMD’s card consumes a lot much less energy. Even the RX 6950 XT tops out at 335 watts, which compares to the 450W the RTX 3090 Ti can draw. Overall, AMD’s current-gen choices are far more environment friendly, with the RX 6400 sipping down solely a measly 50W of energy.
The necessary playing cards to name out are the RX 6X50 XT refreshes: The RX 6950 XT, RX 6750 XT, and RX 6650 XT. These playing cards are up to date variations of their respective base fashions, and so they carry two variations. Each of the playing cards includes a slight enhance in clock pace (as much as 4.2% on the RX 6950 XT) and 18Gbps GDDR6 reminiscence, which improves bandwidth.
These newer fashions don’t provide a major efficiency profit primarily based on our testing, as they carry the identical variety of cores and the identical quantity of reminiscence as their respective base fashions. However, you might discover these refreshes extra available as a result of they launched far after the preliminary lineup.
AMD RX 6000: Performance
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
Although AMD’s graphics playing cards have normally performed second fiddle to Nvidia’s, that’s not the case with RX 6000 playing cards. In many instances, they go toe-to-toe with Nvidia’s finest whereas coming in at a considerably lower cost. There are some outliers, nevertheless.
The flagship RX 6950 XT was capable of hit 68 fps at 4K in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla primarily based on our exams, outpacing Nvidia’s RTX 3090. At 1440p, the RX 6700 XT competes nicely with the RTX 3070, matching Nvidia’s card in Fortnite with a 121 fps common at 1440p with the Ultra graphics preset.
The lower-end fashions present some variations. The budget-focused RX 6600 and RX 6600 XT are nice for 1080p gaming, although they compete with Nvidia’s RTX 3060. The solely unhealthy possibility out of the vary is the RX 6500 XT, which struggles to supply playable body charges attributable to extreme bottlenecks within the PCIe connection and reminiscence (learn our RX 6500 XT evaluate for extra).
AMD’s RDNA 2 graphics playing cards carry out nice, however they’ve an enormous weak point: Ray tracing. Based on our testing, RX 6000 GPUs produce about half of the body fee of Nvidia’s GPUs when ray tracing is turned on. This comes all the way down to how RX 6000 GPUs are designed, packing in a ray tracing accelerator in every compute unit as a substitute of devoted ray tracing cores like Nvidia makes use of.
AMD RX 6000: Laptop GPUs and APUs
AMD began its RX 6000 cell vary with three playing cards: The RX 6600M, RX 6700M, and RX 6800M. The lineup has grown lots since then. Here are the entire laptop computer RX 6000 graphics playing cards out there:
Compute models
Game clock
Infinity cache
Memory
RX 6850 XT
40
2,463MHz
96MB
12GB GDDR6
RX 6800M
40
2,300MHz
96MB
12GB GDDR6
RX 6700M
36
2,300MHz
80MB
10GB GDDR6
RX 6650M XT
32
2,162MHz
32MB
8GB GDDR6
RX 6650M
28
2,222MHz
32MB
8GB GDDR6
RX 6600M
28
2,177MHz
32MB
8GB GDDR6
RX 6500M
16
2,191MHz
16MB
4GB GDDR6
RX 6300M
12
1,515MHz
8MB
2GB GDDR6
RX 6800S
32
1,975MHz
32MB
8GB GDDR6
RX 6700S
28
1,890MHz
32MB
8GB GDDR6
RX 6600S
28
1,881MHz
32MB
4GB GDDR6
We had an opportunity to check the flagship RX 6800M. AMD claimed that it might beat the cell RTX 3080 in video games like Assassin’s Creed Valhalla and Resident Evil: Village, however the outcomes are somewhat extra sophisticated. The RX 6800M can certainly beat Nvidia’s finest in video games optimized for RDNA2, however it might probably battle in sure configurations primarily based on our testing.
AMD additionally affords its RX 6000S graphics playing cards, which aren’t fairly as highly effective as their M-series counterparts. They match the specs, however these GPUs are designed for skinny and light-weight laptops.
In addition to discrete playing cards, AMD has put its RDNA 2 structure to make use of in Ryzen 6000 built-in graphics. Although built-in graphics won’t ever match discrete, the ability of RDNA 2 helps Ryzen 6000 laptops hit playable body charges and not using a devoted GPU, at the least in much less demanding video games.
AMD RX 6000: Ray tracing and FidelityFX options
With RDNA2, AMD now affords absolutely hardware-accelerated ray tracing, although it does it in a barely totally different trend to Nvidia. It doesn’t have devoted RT cores like RTX 20- and 30-series playing cards, however incorporates a ray accelerator into the usual Radeon compute models.
AMD additionally expanded its library of FidelityFX options to work hand-in-hand with ray-tracing compute and shader results to deliver higher visible constancy to video games. Denoiser and variable fee shading algorithms assist to adapt picture high quality primarily based upon luminance and movement, and a collection of compute-based results can also be out there to builders.
One of these results is FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR). FSR is a supersampling approach that may improve efficiency and not using a vital loss in picture high quality. It works by feeding an algorithm with a low-resolution inner render. The algorithm then takes that data and expands the pixels into a bigger grid, resulting in what appears to be like like a high-resolution picture.
We’re now on FSR 2.0, which matches toe-to-toe with Nvidia’s Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS). Although FSR is a function of RX 6000 graphics playing cards, the function isn’t unique to them. FSR works on Nvidia and AMD GPUs going again to 2016.
Editors’ Recommendations