At a look
Expert’s Rating
Pros
- Fast PCIe 5.0 performer
- Up to 4TB capability, with 8TB within the works
- Higher-than-average TBW score
Cons
- Not the least costly within the class
Our Verdict
Corsair’s newest MP700 Pro XT ups the efficiency ante for the MP700 collection. It’s quick and inexpensive, although it doesn’t fairly lead the pack in both division.
Price When Reviewed
This worth will present the geolocated pricing textual content for product undefined
Best Pricing Today
Price When Reviewed
1TB: $160 I 2TB: $250 I 4TB: $460
Best Prices Today: Corsair MP700 Pro XT
If it appears as if we’ve reviewed fairly a couple of MP700’s from Corsair, it’s as a result of we have now (MP700 Elite, MP700 Pro, MP700 Pro SE). The firm retains upping the ante with efficiency or different options, so we’re again with yet one more — the MP700 Pro XT.
Is it higher than its predecessors? Yup. Not by a ton, however hey! Every little bit counts. All that apart, the MP700 Pro XT is a top-notch PCIe 5.0 SSD.
Read on to be taught extra, then see our roundup of the best SSDs for comparability.
What are the Corsair MP700 Pro XT’s options?
An M.2 2280 (22mm broad, 80mm lengthy) SSD, the MP700 Pro XT options PCIe 5.0, a Phison E28 controller, and 218-layer TLC NAND. The drive is a DRAM design for sooner random ops, with 1GB of cache per terabyte of capability.
The MP700 Pro XT carries a 5-year guarantee and a 700TBW (terabytes which may be written earlier than read-only mode commences) per 1TB of capability endurance score. The former is normal, and the latter barely extra beneficiant than the 600TBW norm for this class of drive.
How a lot is the Corsair MP700 Pro XT?
The MP700 Pro is accessible in 1TB/$160, 2TB/$250, and 4TB/$460 capacities, with an 8TB mannequin apparently within the works. Those are the costs from the corporate’s personal internet retailer. You may see them cheaper finally on Amazon.
Compared to the competitors, these costs are increased than the Samsung 9100 Pro and barely increased than the WD SN8100, and decrease than the Kingston Renegade G5 and Crucial T710 on the time of this writing. Shop round.
How quick is the Corsair MP700 Pro XT?
The MP700 Pro XT was very quick, although the benchmarks have been a bit sunnier than our real-world transfers. A relatively lackluster time in our 450GB write check utilizing Fast Copy damage its general rating, which was nonetheless fifth quickest amongst NVMe SSDs.
The MP700 Pro XT’s numbers in CrystalDiskMark 8’s sequential exams have been glorious.
Random efficiency, however, was slower than the competing drives (additionally DRAM designs) when just one queue was used. Windows itself usually makes use of solely a single queue.
The MP700 Pro XT was only a hair off the tempo in our 48GB transfers, particularly with the folders.
It was the slowish (for PCIe 5.0) 450GB write with Fast Copy that sabotaged the MP700 Pro XT’s general rating. Not that it’s sluggish within the grand scheme of issues, however its rivals, particularly the Samsung 9100 Pro have been a lot sooner.
Jon L. Jacobi
During the second consecutive 450GB write (no pause in between), velocity dropped, however solely to 1.5GBps. Not too shabby.
All advised, the MP700 Pro is effectively inside the PCIe 5.0 DRAM efficiency ballpark. I’d nonetheless prefer to see a bit higher efficiency transfers with Fast Copy, however in any other case, it’s all good.
Should you purchase the Corsair MP700 Pro XT?
Yes, given the correct worth. It’s an excellent performer, however so are its rivals. In fact, you’d be very happy with any of the highest contenders. Shop for the most effective worth.
How we check
Drive exams at the moment make the most of Windows 11 24H2, 64-bit operating off of a PCIe 4.0 Samsung 990 Pro in an Asus Z890-Creator WiFi (PCIe 4.0/5.0) motherboard. The CPU is a Core Ultra i5 225 feeding/fed by two Crucial 64GB DDR5 5600MHz modules (128GB of reminiscence complete).
Both 20Gbps USB and Thunderbolt 5 are built-in into the motherboard and Intel CPU/GPU graphics are used. Internal PCIe 5.0 SSDs concerned in testing are mounted in an Asus Hyper M.2 x16 Gen5 adapter card sitting in a PCIe 5.0 slot.
We run the CrystalDiskMark 8.04 (and 9), AS SSD 2, and ATTO 4 artificial benchmarks (to maintain article size down, we report solely the previous) to search out the storage gadget’s potential efficiency. Then we run a collection of 48GB switch and 450GB write exams utilizing Windows Explorer drag and drop to point out what customers will see throughout routine copy operations, in addition to the far sooner FastCopy run as administrator to point out what’s doable.
A 25GBps two-SSD RAID 0 array on the aforementioned Asus Hyper M.2 x16 Gen5 is used because the second drive in our switch exams. Formerly the 48GB exams have been achieved with a RAM disk serving that goal.
Each check is carried out on a NTFS-formatted and newly TRIM’d drive so the outcomes are optimum. Note that in regular use, as a drive fills up, efficiency might lower resulting from much less NAND for secondary caching, in addition to different elements. This concern has abated considerably with the present crop of SSDs using extra mature controllers and much sooner, late-generation NAND.
Note that our testing MO evolves and these outcomes might not match these from earlier articles. Only comparisons contained in the article are 100% legitimate as these outcomes are gathered utilizing the present {hardware} and MO.
