Gaming displays are mendacity to us, they usually have been for a few years. Informed consumers know the tips that manufacturers play to promote the very best gaming displays, they usually’ve realized to navigate the misleading advertising. But these ploys persist, and 2023 is the 12 months when displays have to get a little bit extra clear.
Some of the important thing areas the place gaming displays mislead consumers have been working rampant for years, whereas others are pretty new. As we begin a brand new 12 months and look onto next-gen shows, take into account this shopping for recommendation for selecting up your subsequent gaming show, in addition to a name to arms to demand producers do higher.
HDR
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
Perhaps the largest space of misinformation round gaming displays is HDR, in addition to all of the specs that relate to good HDR efficiency. For HDR, the issue boils right down to a disparate checklist of requirements which can be haphazardly slapped on product listings with out concern for what they imply.

The commonplace for HDR proper now could be VESA’s DisplayHDR certification. It’s a wildly widespread commonplace, being adopted by greater than 1,000 shows during the last 5 years, and it covers a number of essential parts for strong HDR efficiency. Those embrace peak brightness, native dimming capabilities, colour depth, and colour gamut. In addition, it specifies particular use circumstances for these metrics.
VESA defined to me that in tiers like DisplayHDR 1,000, it measures not solely peak brightness in a part of the display, but in addition full-screen peak brightness. A consultant mentioned that is vital for video games the place you might even see a flashbang impact or one thing comparable, requiring a fast blast of brightness.
However, a number of manufacturers have piggybacked off of VESA’s commonplace with deceptive HDR certifications. The most egregious case got here in 2021 when Chinese retailer Taobao listed a Samsung and Acer monitor with a faux DisplayHDR 2,000 badge. There is not any DisplayHDR 2,000 tier.
What’s the purpose of getting an ordinary if nothing is commonplace?

There are extra widespread and urgent examples, nonetheless, and Samsung is a key offender. Although some Samsung shows are licensed with DisplayHDR, most use “HDR 1,000” or “HDR 2,000” branding to notice HDR efficiency, with the quantity often referring to the height brightness of the show. Even then, some displays mislead on the brightness entrance. For instance, the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 comes with “Quantum HDR 2,000,” even supposing it solely helps 1,000 nits of peak brightness in accordance with Samsung’s personal product itemizing.
Similarly, Asus’ just lately launched Nebula HDR commonplace for laptop computer shows lists imprecise specs. The commonplace goes “up to 1,100 nits of peak brightness” and “can have hundreds, if not thousands, of separate dimming zones in a single panel,” however all panels use the identical Nebula HDR branding. For instance, the 2023 Zephyrus G14 has 504 native dimming zones and 600 nits of peak brightness, whereas the 2023 Zephyrus M16 sports activities 1,024 dimming zones and 1,100 nits of peak brightness. Both carry the identical ROG Nebula HDR branding. What’s the purpose of getting an ordinary if nothing is commonplace?
I don’t have any points with firms growing requirements for his or her merchandise, however after they’re designed to appear to be a longtime business certification, they’re designed to mislead. At the very least, if firms are going to create their very own HDR requirements, they need to additionally undergo the method of certifying them with a 3rd celebration like VESA.

This is all of the extra vital contemplating the specs HDR touches. Peak brightness, for instance, doesn’t account for the way a lot of the display can get that shiny and for the way lengthy. Is it one pixel for a fraction of a second, or 10% of the display for 30 minutes? No one is checking, and also you don’t need to be the model promoting a monitor with decrease specs on paper.
Contrast ratio has the identical drawback. Both the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 (2022) and Alienware 34 QD-OLED checklist a distinction ratio of 1,000,000:1. However, the OLED panel and its self-emitting pixels on the Alienware 34 QD-OLED means it has a near-infinite distinction ratio, whereas third-party opinions present the Samsung monitor with round a 15,000:1 ratio. I don’t blame Samsung right here, both. It needs to color its merchandise in the very best gentle, however when these essential specs say so little, it’s laborious to imagine them in any respect.
Response time
It’s laborious to seize with a digicam, however the artifacts on the highest overdrive degree are too noticeable to disregard. Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
Response time has lengthy been an space of confusion and deceptive specs for gaming displays. There are a number of methods to check response time, they usually produce wildly totally different outcomes. And, after all, firms that need to promote you gaming displays are going to make use of the quantity that makes their product look its finest.
You gained’t discover a gaming monitor that advertises a response time over 1 millisecond, which makes response time a pointless spec. The overwhelming majority of displays solely checklist gray-to-gray (GtG) response time, which is how briskly the pixel transitions from one shade of grey to a different. It doesn’t inform which shades, how shiny the monitor is, how lengthy it’s been working, and so forth., and these all affect the precise response time of the show.
The extra telling spec is Moving Picture Response Time (MPRT), which measures the visibility of pixels. This quantity attracts nearer to the movement blur you truly see on display, and movement readability is the very important element that response time is trying to trace.
Response time is without doubt one of the most vital metrics for gaming, and product listings do little to make clear how merchandise stack up.

Ideally, producers ought to checklist each. You could have a monitor with a 1ms GtG response time, however with a 60Hz refresh price, the MPRT is 16.6ms. You’ll see blur on the overwhelming majority of objects.
On high of that, monitor manufacturers sometimes measure GtG response time at excessive overdrive ranges. Pixel overdrive reduces the response time of the monitor and may, theoretically, produce pictures with extra movement readability. However, overdrive usually produces ghosting and coronas, each of that are artifacts that appear to be movement blur in a shifting picture. Again, monitor manufacturers often don’t specify the overdrive degree in response time metrics, including much more confusion to this spec.
VESA
VESA is trying to tug the curtain again on response occasions with ClearMR. This offers a Clear Motion Ratio (CMR), which is a measure of clear to blurry pixels in a set of exams. This is much more complete than GtG and MPRT specs listed collectively. It seems on the last picture, not only a take a look at sample, and it accounts for sharpening, overdrive, and the movement readability strategies that gaming displays use.
ClearMR simply launched final 12 months, and solely 33 shows are licensed proper now. Response time is well one of the crucial vital metrics for gaming, and for years, product listings have achieved little or no to make clear how merchandise stack up. Listing GtG and MPRT is an efficient first step, however requirements like ClearMR embody much more.
Resolution

Gaming displays don’t lie about their decision, so I don’t need to mislead anybody right here. If you see a monitor promoting 4K, it has a 4K decision. At the very least, I’ve by no means encountered a monitor that straight-up lies about its decision.
The major level right here is that we might see some deceptive branding with future gaming displays. Samsung’s Odyssey Neo G9 (2023), for instance, was revealed by AMD final November because the “first 8K ultrawide.” And coming off the primary hands-on time with the press, you will discover half a dozen articles claiming it’s an 8K monitor, too.
It’s not an 8K monitor, although. The Rec.2020 commonplace defines 8K as a pixel rely of 7,680 x 4,320. In addition, there are teams just like the 8K Association that oversee 8K shows, in addition to the ecosystem to energy them with content material. The new Odyssey Neo G9 has a decision of 7,680 x 2,160. You’d have to stack two of them on high of one another for a real 8K decision.
Samsung by no means claimed its monitor was 8K, however this an space rife for deceptive branding going into next-gen shows. As we proceed to see unique facet ratios and better resolutions, I’ve little question that “8K” can be thrown round loosely. We’re seeing that already, and that’s with a single monitor from one of many world’s largest manufacturers.
What gaming displays can do
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
Gaming monitor manufacturers have to do higher, however that’s straightforward to say. In actuality, manufacturers within the enterprise of promoting gaming displays need their displays to look good on the spec sheet. Are you going to checklist a 15,000:1 distinction ratio when you possibly can measure 1,000,000:1 underneath sure circumstances? No one needs to be in that place.
That’s why third-party business requirements are vital. DisplayHDR has already set a transparent baseline for HDR over the previous a number of years, and ClearMR might clear up — if you happen to’ll forgive the pun — response occasions in an analogous manner. Short of an business watchdog group, these certifications are the one technique to set clear requirements for high quality in gaming displays, and people have been sorely lacking for the final a number of years.
Although I don’t have a transparent path ahead, the scenario now isn’t working. Spec sheets say little or no about how a gaming monitor truly works, and in an area rife with deceptive branding, essential parts like HDR efficiency, brightness, and response time want outlined requirements that customers can depend on. Otherwise, you may as properly ignore the spec sheet utterly when shopping for a gaming monitor, and I definitely don’t need to make my shopping for choices that manner.
This article is a part of ReSpec – an ongoing biweekly column that features discussions, recommendation, and in-depth reporting on the tech behind PC gaming.

Editors’ Recommendations