Google Cloud has joined AWS and Europe-based Cloud Infrastructure Services Providers in Europe (CISPE) in protesting Microsoft’s anticompetitive cloud software program licensing practices within the EU.“Microsoft’s cloud licensing restrictions restrict choice and create harmful downstream impacts for companies, ranging from higher costs to more security breaches to a chilling effect on smaller cloud and software providers including European AI startups,” Amit Zavery, vice chairman of platforms at Google Cloud, wrote on X.Microsoft ought to finish the arbitrary “Listed Provider” designation and permit clients to run their beforehand bought software program on any platform with out paying as a lot as 5x extra to make use of non-Azure clouds, Zavery stated, including that Microsoft shouldn’t be permitted to choose and select who it competes with.Zavery was including to the narrative, which rose from a grievance submitted by CISPE to the EU in November 2022, claiming that Microsoft’s new cloud software program licensing phrases revealed in October of that yr had been unhealthy for the EU’s cloud ecosystem.The new cloud software program licensing phrases had been revealed within the first place by Microsoft in an effort to keep away from one other grievance introduced on by German software program supplier SubsequentCloud, France’s OVHcloud, Italian cloud service supplier Aruba, and a Danish affiliation of cloud service suppliers.In his interview with Reuters, Zavery claimed that Microsoft’s anticompetitive software program licensing practices for the cloud may also have a ripple impact on rising applied sciences similar to generative AI and AI normally. However, it’s to be famous that each firms are competing fiercely in generative AI and the prolonged AI phase, with Microsoft gaining an higher hand by releasing instruments similar to ChatGPT and Copilot forward of Google’s launch of Duet AI and Gemini.Conflicting views on the issueAlthough Zavery identified the costly nature of Microsoft’s licensing insurance policies, Daniel Castro, director of the Center for Data Innovation at suppose tank ITIF, stated he believes Microsoft’s licensing phrases are honest and particularly “not anticompetitive” in nature. “Microsoft’s Services Provider License Agreement is available to any cloud provider. Indeed, many of Microsoft’s competitors use it to offer Microsoft services. For example, Amazon offers Microsoft SQL Server and Active Directory on AWS. Competitors can offer Microsoft software, but quite reasonably, Microsoft wants them to pay for these licenses,” Castro defined.Microsoft refuted Zavery’s claims and stated that it has labored with unbiased cloud suppliers to vary its licensing phrases to handle their issues.“Worldwide, more than 100 cloud providers have already taken advantage of these changes,” a Microsoft spokesperson stated. However, Zavery took exception to Microsoft’s strategy of working with particular person distributors and referred to as it a tactic of avoiding broader points whereas making the most of choosing and selecting distributors they wish to take care of. “We will continue to raise these issues on behalf of our customers. This should be a transparent process where all affected stakeholders have a seat at the table. Only a resolution that is fair for all in the cloud market will create a level playing field for all,” Zavery wrote on X tagging the EU deal with.Along with the grievance by CISPE, the European Commission has acquired different complaints in opposition to Microsoft just lately. Last yr, it started wanting right into a grievance relating to Microsoft’s bundling of Teams with Microsoft 365.On the opposite, nevertheless, ITIF’s Castro stated CISPE could also be utilizing EU antitrust regulators, who have already got a bone to choose with US tech firms, to strengthen their place on the negotiating desk.“While software licensing could conceivably be a factor in some cases, it is unlikely to be a key factor in shaping this market,” Castro stated, explaining the rationale behind his perception and including that hyperscalers similar to Microsoft are competing based mostly on elements similar to reliability and safety. Additionally, issues raised by each CISPE and Zavery rake up the difficulty concerning the income of hyperscalers and the smaller distributors working within the EU.While on one hand, Forrester’s senior analyst Dario Maisto identified that anticompetitive practices can have a snowball impact on revenues and market share of sure distributors, Microsoft has cited unbiased analysis to point out that competitors between cloud suppliers within the Union remained wholesome.“And as the latest independent data shows, competition between cloud hyperscalers remains healthy. In 2023, Microsoft and Google made small gains on AWS, which continues to remain the global market leader by a significant margin,” the Microsoft spokesperson stated.Microsoft faces related challenges within the UKThe UK has additionally seen hyperscalers embroiled in controversy over anti-competitive practices of their cloud choices.Last yr in December, Amazon Web Services (AWS) blamed Microsoft for anti-competitive practices within the cloud computing phase in a letter to the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).AWS’s letter got here after the CMA launched an antitrust probe into Microsoft and Amazon’s cloud companies in October.The CMA probe was initiated after UK communications regulator Ofcom in July referred the cloud infrastructure marketplace for investigation round anti-competitive practices in cloud computing to the CMA submit the publication of an interim report.The interim report stated that present cloud clients within the UK are paying greater than they need to be for his or her cloud infrastructure or having to accept low-quality companies and that the regulator had heard issues from some clients about their lack of ability to change or use a number of suppliers.During that point, an AWS spokesperson stated the corporate disagrees with Ofcom’s findings and believes they’re based mostly on a elementary false impression of how the IT sector capabilities, and the companies and reductions on provide.AWS had additionally denied charging clients separate charges for switching knowledge to a different IT supplier, stating that its clients make “hundreds of millions of data transfers each day in the ordinary course of business, and over 90% of our customers pay nothing for data transfer because we provide them with 100 gigabytes per month for free.”In November, Google Cloud too had shared a letter with the CMA blaming Microsoft for anti-competitive practices round cloud choices.In its interim report, Ofcom stated that AWS and Microsoft Azure had a mixed UK market share of between 60% and 70%, whereas the following nearest competitor, Alphabet-owned Google, has a 5% to 10% share.The CMA, which is anticipated to shut the investigation by April 2025, places the UK’s cloud computing market at $9.44 billion (£7.5 billion).
Copyright © 2024 IDG Communications, Inc.