Intel 760P SSD review: This affordable NVMe delivers on read speed, falters on writes

    Intel is advertising and marketing its 760P NVMe SSD and cohort as “NVMe pace for not far more than the price of SATA,” a slower and extra inexpensive interface. That pace is precisely what you get the overwhelming majority of the time. However on events while you copy extra information than the drive’s caching system can maintain, you additionally get sustained write pace that’s solely a little bit sooner than…SATA. Sorry, Intel introduced it up.

    The slowdown in sustained write pace, corresponding to while you copy a Blu-ray film rip or giant sport to the drive, received’t typically have an effect on you. Even when it does, the 760P’s write fee is hardly gradual, and it nonetheless options the stellar learn entry occasions and queued I/O that makes NVMe so scintillating. However there’s a competitor that’s virtually as inexpensive and doesn’t decelerate fairly as a lot—Plextor’s new M9Pe. We’ll be evaluating the 2 within the efficiency part.

    Design, specs, and pricing

    The 512GB 760P we evaluate here’s a 2280 (22mm throughout, 80mm lengthy) M.2/PCIe drive that ships and not using a fancy warmth sink or brand, although there’s extra lettering than proven within the censored picture proven under. the 760P makes use of Silicon Movement’s SM2262 controller and Intel’s personal 3D 64-layered, TLC (Three-bit) NAND.


    The 760P, with all of the lettering on the chips intentionally obscured. 

    Intel calls out the truth that it makes use of floating gate (FG) NAND expertise, whereas the competitors corresponding to Samsung with its TCAT makes use of alternative gate (RG). FG, says Intel, permits for higher cell density and extra effectivity throughout. NAND and its numerous implementations is an especially advanced topic, and you will discover different opinions on the relative deserves. We’ll depart it at that.

    The corporate additionally calls out the 760P’s low energy consumption of 50 milliwatts (mW) whereas operational. After we see this spec quoted by different corporations, it’s virtually all the time considerably increased. For instance, OCZ’s RD400 claims 6 full watts operational, although its idle determine of 6mW is decrease than the 760P’s 25mW. Relying in your utilization, and the accuracy of these numbers, the 760P may both prevent, or price you battery life. 

    The 760P carries a 5-year guarantee and is rated for 72TBW (TeraBytes Written—the quantity of information you’ll be able to write to the drive) per 128GB of capability, which is about par for the course. Although 1TB and 2TB variations of the 760P must be obtainable later within the 12 months, for now you’ll must make do with the $199 512GB model we examined, a $109 256GB model, and unusually this present day, a 128GB model for less than $74.


    The 512GB 760P turned in a superb, virtually chart-topping learn efficiency within the synthetic benchmarks, although it was extra mundane in our copy assessments. However the write efficiency was very disappointing. After operating out of cache, the 760P’s write pace in our real-world copy assessments dropped virtually to SATA ranges—about 575MBps. Intel’s reviewer’s information talked about NVMe energy at a SATA value. It didn’t point out SATA-like sustained writes.

    ssd 7 slowdown IDG

    As you’ll be able to see, when the Intel 760P runs out of cache (at round 6GB on our 512GB take a look at unit), write pace drops to lower than half that when cache is in use, round 575MBps on this case.

    That stated, sustained writes of the scale we carry out, 20GB, are comparatively uncommon operations. The 760P’s efficiency delivers that general kick within the pants you count on each day, nevertheless, it is by far the slowest-writing NVMe drive with giant quantities of information we’ve ever examined.

    Recent Articles

    Related Stories

    Stay on op - Ge the daily news in your inbox