Intel Core i9-12900K review: Intel. Is. Back.

Best Prices Today

$1,449.99

Adorama

Not Available

Free

Everyone likes redemption tales, and Intel’s 12th gen Core i9-12900Okay is a comeback story for the ages. The as soon as mighty and complacent champ was defeated years in the past, pressured by means of one humiliating loss after one other by the hands of AMD’s resurgent Ryzen processors, till lastly by some means discovering a manner again to preventing type and claiming victory as soon as once more. Fade to black and cue credit.

Life (and expertise) by no means has that Hollywood ending, however Intel’s Core i9-12900Okay will get fairly damned shut. After years of being pummeled by AMD processors, the 12900Okay’s efficiency makes it the much better CPU for most individuals than its bitter rival, the Ryzen 9 5950X. No, it’s not a knock-out victory by any means, however contemplating the place it excels and the options it packs, Intel’s 12th-gen “Alder Lake” processor is the CPU to purchase at the moment if you happen to’re available in the market for a high-end desktop processor.

What is 12th-gen Alder Lake?

You’ll wish to learn our protection of Intel’s 12th-gen Alder Lake reveal for the complete nitty-gritty particulars of the unconventional new structure, but it surely’s basically a hybrid CPU design constructed on the Intel 7 course of. That alone is a large deal; after spending over half a decade mired on 14nm transistor expertise, Alder Lake lastly leaps up a node. (Intel 7 used to be called 10nm earlier than a rebrand.) It mixes newly designed high-performance CPU cores with smaller, extra environment friendly cores to realize an optimum steadiness of performance-to-power ratios. Ever since rumors of Alder Lake first leaked, individuals (together with ourselves) have puzzled simply what Intel was pondering by mixing its long-anticipated upgraded cores with “Atom-like” effectivity cores. But a greater manner to consider Alder Lake is that it’s Intel’s first “Intel 7” course of desktop CPU with a very redesigned massive core, and for good measure, a bunch of additional effectivity cores that may carry out in addition to its earlier 10th-gen cores thrown in too. 12th-gen Alder Lake additionally ushers in a brand new period of options, together with PCIe 5.0, DDR5 memory, and a brand new LGA1700 socket.

Gordon Mah Ung

How we examined

For this overview, we’ll be specializing in the principle occasion, dialing in on the efficiency of Intel’s Core i9-12900Okay. Our overview of the Core i5-12600Okay will quickly comply with. With the introduction of Windows 11 and its associated teething issues, it’s been a little bit of a messy overview cycle. In the top although, a brand new patch and drivers which have corrected Ryzen 5000’s points on the brand new OS meant we performed our assessments solely in Windows 11 at the moment.

While we had been testing, standard Youtube channel Hardware Unboxed reported that it had run into a difficulty the place AMD’s Windows 11 L3 cache bug returned if a processor swap was performed with Ryzen. We fortuitously didn’t run into it, but it surely felt price mentioning. And for individuals who would scream, “testing should only be done on Windows 10 for Ryzen!” Hardware Unboxed additionally famous that Windows 11 efficiency is usually 5 percent better for Ryzen than Windows 10.

For the AMD Ryzen system, we used an MSI MEG X570 Godlike board up to date with newest BIOS and 64GB of DDR4/3600 Corsair Dominator dual-rank RAM. AMD’s Precision Boost Overdrive characteristic was set to auto and we chosen the AMP reminiscence overclocking profile.

For the Intel Core system, we used an Asus ROG Maximus Z690 Hero board outfitted with 64GB of DDR5/4800 Corsair Dominator dual-rank RAM. As it’s DDR5, the RAM is technically quad-channel. The board was set to its default state, with the Multi-Core Enhancement characteristic on auto and the XMP memory profile chosen.

Both methods had been cooled with Corsair H150i Pro Elite Capellix 360mm coolers with fan profiles manually set to 1,800 RPM. LEDs had been turned off on each methods throughout energy consumption assessments. For storage, 1TB PCIe 4.0 Corsair MP600 Core SSDs had been used. Both methods had been powered with Corsair HX1000 Platinum power supplies.

For graphics, Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition cards had been used.

Intel

Intel’s 12th lineup is fairly sparse, however quick nonetheless. To see the picture above (or any benchmark charts on this article) at full decision, right-click on them and choose “open image in new tab.”

CPU rendering efficiency

We’ll kick this off in an space that Intel hardly ever likes to speak about: 3D rendering and modeling. Intel’s rationale has lengthy been that so few individuals really use these purposes on a PC, that it’s foolish to think about them as a significant measurement of efficiency for individuals. Many will notice that Intel made this pivot away from rendering efficiency solely when eclipsed by AMD’s stellar Ryzen CPUs. With that mentioned, we’ll begin with Maxon’s Cinebench R23, which is a free take a look at primarily based on the rendering engine used within the firm’s Cinema4D utility, which can also be embedded in some Adobe purposes.

The latest model adopts a 10-minute throttling take a look at as its default. We’re not followers of it however many reviewers will publish this end result. Although we don’t have a Windows 11 end result for Intel’s 10th-gen and 11th-gen chips, we do know beneath Windows 10, the 10-core Core i9-10900K scores 14,336 whereas the 8-core Core i9-11900K scores 16,264. Both, the truth is, are simply knocked out of the ring by AMD’s 12-core Ryzen 9 5900X, which is the 22,168 vary. It’s why we didn’t even trouble to get up the 16-core Ryzen 9 5950X for that struggle because it wasn’t wanted.

The eye-opener right here although is that massive, lengthy blue bar for the Core i9-12900Okay. There’s been loads mentioned about whether or not it even made sense for Intel to pursue a hybrid design on Alder Lake, however for individuals who have been pounding the desk for the final 4 years over Cinebench efficiency, the 12900Okay makes no apologizes by barely edging AMD’s greatest and brightest CPU in a benchmark the place Ryzen has lengthy held homefield benefit.

IDG

Intel is correct although. Most PC customers don’t run purposes that may use each CPU core and thread obtainable, so it’s necessary to have a look at single-threaded efficiency utilizing Cinebench too. While multi-core efficiency in Cinebench might offer you an thought of how an all-core video encode or photograph export in Lightroom Classic may find yourself, the Cinebench R23 single-threaded efficiency will get you nearer to what you may see in Office or Photoshop runs. Again, we don’t have Windows 11 outcomes for the Core i9-10900Okay or the Core i9-11900Okay, however we are able to inform you the 10th-gen half pulls down a (comparatively) dismal 1,325, whereas the 11th-gen matches Ryzen at 1,640.

Intel’s newest efficiency cores, nevertheless, supply up a formidable as hell 19 p.c improve in efficiency over the Ryzen 9 5950X and embarrass the older 10th-gen chip to the tune of 31 p.c. For Mac followers questioning how a lot the MacE book Pro’s M1 Max beats Alder Lake—it doesn’t. In single-threaded efficiency, which is a fairer option to examine cellular chips with desktop chips, the 12th-gen Alder Lake CPU is roughly 20 p.c quicker than Apple’s latest M1 chips. Sure, Intel’s new chips aren’t constructed for laptops, however when Intel’s 12th-gen-based laptops come out, the MacBook Pro could have a struggle on its palms too.

IDG

Moving on from Cinebench R23, our subsequent take a look at is the venerable POV-Ray benchmark that’s as previous because the Amiga. The take a look at has clearly been up to date over time, but it surely’s a neat ray tracing expertise that creates superb photos from easy text-based information. This leans slightly extra into the “who really does this?’ argument that Intel makes, but it surely’s nonetheless a helpful benchmark comparability of uncooked CPU efficiency. Up first is the all-core benchmark between the chips. We once more see these two monstrous CPUs battling it to a standstill.

IDG

Like Cinebench, POV-Ray additionally provides a single-threaded mode which we run. The outcomes principally mirror the efficiency of Cinebench R23, however the 12th-gen Core i9 benefit is lower all the way down to roughly 14 p.c as an alternative of 19 p.c. It’s nonetheless a rock-solid win for the most recent Intel CPU although, and once more, in all probability slightly extra necessary to what most individuals do on their PC more often than not.

IDG

You could be questioning why Intel isn’t plastering the world with its efficiency lead over Ryzen 5000 in Cinebench. Well, first, that may just about invalidate what Intel has been preaching about utilizing “real world” purposes for the previous couple of years and could be blatantly hypocritical. But multi-threaded efficiency isn’t the whole lock for the Core i9-12900Okay both. For instance, up subsequent you see the results of utilizing the open supply Blender 2.93 to render the Barbershop Interior Benchmark scene. The outcomes are in seconds, and we are able to see the Ryzen 9 5950X has the lead right here by ending the render in 20 p.c much less time than the 12th-gen Core i9. Some of this can be from the design of the Ryzen chip and Blender itself, in addition to the particulars of this benchmark scene—however a few of it could merely be that 32 threads of all-big-core efficiency issues too. The Ryzen in the end has 25 p.c extra threads to course of the render vs. the 12900Okay’s 24 threads, 16 of which come from the smaller higher-efficiency cores.

IDG

Up subsequent is the Corona benchmark that, like Agent Johnson and Agent Johnson, bears no relation to the beer or the virus. Instead, it’s an unbiased photorealistic renderer. That doesn’t imply it’s a good benchmark to chips, it simply means when it renders a scene, it takes no visible shortcuts. We once more see the Ryzen 9 chip get some payback on the 12th-gen Core i9 by rendering the scene 21 p.c quicker. The excellent news for Intel’s 12900Okay is that regardless of being unable to win this battle with the Ryzen 9, it’s nonetheless providing a big efficiency improve over the earlier technology. Again, we didn’t have Windows 11-based outcomes useful for the Core i9-11900Okay, however that 11th-gen chip scores 5,937,670 in Windows 10, which supplies the brand new Core i9-12900Okay a hefty 48 p.c enchancment over it.

IDG

Our remaining 3D rendering take a look at makes use of Chaosgroup’s V-Ray 5 benchmark, which is an expert rendering engine that has garnered sufficient Emmy and Academy awards that it’s virtually on the best way to an EGOT. The benchmark options GPU and CPU assessments, however we’re clearly solely within the CPU outcomes right here. The 32 threads of the Ryzen 9 nonetheless put it forward, however the margin closes to 11 p.c.

IDG

Compression efficiency

Moving on from 3D rendering, we used the free, standard, and quick 7-Zip’s inside benchmark to gauge compression efficiency of the CPUs. The benchmark seems at what number of threads a CPU has, and spools up a number of iterations of itself through the take a look at. The massive winner right here is Ryzen, to the tune of 24 p.c in compression efficiency and 35 p.c in decompression efficiency when all cores are used.

On the compression facet, reminiscence latency, dimension of the information cache, and translation look forward buffer efficiency issues, whereas on the decompression facet integer in addition to department misprediction penalties matter, based on 7-cpu.com‘s documents. In the end, we’d say the multi-threaded efficiency is pretty tutorial since utilizing the precise utility to decompress or compress information usually depends on a single-thread.

The downside for 12th-gen Core i9 is even there it’s not spectacular both. In reality, the 11th-gen Core i9 is barely quicker at 7,916 in single-threaded efficiency beneath Windows 10. The easy reply is Ryzen 9 maintains the sting in compression efficiency in 7-zip, interval. Some of it could come from the reminiscence latency of the nascent DDR5 reminiscence and the truth that 7-Zip doesn’t make use of any particular directions, however Ryzen wins right here.

IDG

Encode efficiency

Our subsequent take a look at is a CPU encode take a look at the place we take the free, open-source Handbrake transcoder/encoder and job it with changing the free, open-source 4K Tears of Steel video to 1080p decision utilizing H.265. The Ryzen 9 once more is available in first, ending the encode about 6 p.c quicker. That’s not a an enormous victory however first is first.

IDG

Synthetic efficiency

Our subsequent take a look at shifts from sensible compression and encoding to Geekbench 5. The take a look at is an artificial benchmark made up of 21 separate small “loops” that its developer, Primate Labs, mentioned are modelled on standard purposes in all the things from textual content rendering to HDR to machine language and encryption efficiency. The benchmark has been the topic of controversy prior to now, however it’s arduous to take care of any take a look at at the moment with out sniping. It is stupidly standard, nevertheless, and it doesn’t matter what you consider Geekbench 5, individuals wish to see how a CPU performs on it. After a considerably backwards and forwards in 3D rendering, compressing and encoding, we see the Intel Core i9-12900Okay out tempo the Ryzen 9 5950X by about 8 p.c.

IDG

Geekbench 5 additionally experiences single-threaded efficiency, which is a neater option to make cross comparisons. You may, for instance, examine the scores from the 24-core 12900Okay in opposition to a 10th-gen Core i5 or perhaps a laptop computer, because the core depend benefit and thermal benefit of a desktop is much less of an element on this take a look at. Against simply the Ryzen 9 5950X although, we see the 12th-gen Core i9 open its lead up by about 11 p.c.

IDG

Content creation efficiency

Moving from artificial assessments to precise purposes individuals use, our first take a look at is UL’s new Procyon 2.0. It’s a benchmark that requires you to put in Adobe Photoshop (we used 22.5) and Adobe Lightroom Classic (we used model 10.4) on the PC. The take a look at then duties the pc with a set of scripts to find out efficiency. It’s about as actual as you may get because you’re really measuring Photoshop and Lightroom Classic efficiency.

The total rating provides the nod to the Core i9-12900Okay by 4 p.c over the Ryzen 9 59050X. Procyon 2.0 breaks down its outcomes two methods: picture retouch and batch exports. In the picture retouch, it’s principally a tie between the 12th gen Core i9 and Ryzen 9 based on Procyon. In Batch Processing, which is generally Lightroom Classic photograph export efficiency, the Core i9 nudges the lead as much as 5 p.c. That final one stunned us slightly as a result of Lightroom Exports are inclined to lean very a lot on multi-core efficiency, so we might have anticipated Ryzen 9 to win there. It didn’t.

IDG

With large sprawling purposes like Photshop and Lightoom Classic, completely different actions and filters may very well offer you completely different efficiency outcomes, so along with Procyon 2.0, we additionally run Puget System’s Pugetbench for Photoshop. It’s a free take a look at that the customized workstation PC builder created to assist inform its buyer suggestions.

Unlike Procyon 2.0, Pugetbench for Photoshop focuses solely on Photoshop efficiency. While Procyon 2.0 gave the 12th-gen Core i9 a mere 4 p.c lead, Intel’s latest chip inks a far larger win in Pugetbench with almost a 15 p.c benefit over the Ryzen 9. Diving into the subscores the benchmark produces, we see that 12 p.c of that comes from the GPU (sure, the identical GPU and drivers had been used on each), 13.5 p.c typically use, and 15.1 p.c within the filter take a look at. This is a really stable win for the Core i9-12900Okay regardless of how you narrow it.

IDG

Pugetbench additionally features a benchmark for Lightroom Classic. The result’s one other clear win for the 12th-gen Core i9 over Ryzen 9, with a rating 14 p.c quicker than AMD’s mighty 5950X. Pugetbench breaks it down by lively rating (which is how responsive the system is whereas modifying pictures in Lightroom Classic) and passive rating (which is velocity throughout such actions as file exports). In lively efficiency, Pugetbench provides the Core i9-12900Okay a few 10 p.c benefit, whereas the passive rating for exports generates a shocking 17 p.c benefit. That’s two out of two for Intel in Pugetbench that are very, very priceless wins to have.

IDG

Moving on to video modifying, our first take a look at once more reaches for Pugetbench’s Premiere Pro benchmark. Our outcomes beneath are little completely different as a result of we’ve added two extra entries you didn’t see above. These are for the Intel CPUs with their built-in graphics cores off, which limits Premiere’s capacity to entry the chip’s encode and decode engines. Puget Systems really recommends that you simply depart the IGP on for video modifying even when you’ve got a quick GPU. We think about the official rating to be with the IGP on, however Intel additionally sells CPUs with the built-in graphics cores completely switched off, so simply know what you’re shopping for.

With the IGP on, the 12th-gen Core i9 is a monster in comparison with Ryzen 9 with its total rating almost 37 p.c quicker. Much of that comes from the stay playback rating, which will get an enormous increase from having the built-in graphics cores. We’re unsure, however we suspect Intel’s Quick Sync expertise could also be accountable for a lot of this. With the IGP off, nevertheless, it’s far nearer however nonetheless a 6 p.c benefit for the 12900Okay.

IDG

As we did with the picture editors, we backstop our Premiere testing by additionally working Procyon 2.0’s Video Editing module. It additionally depends on real-world purposes and requires that Premiere Pro be put in. Unlike Pugetbench, nevertheless, which seems at efficiency whereas actively driving the appliance, Procyon is principally a measurement of how briskly the system will export movies from the timeline with colour correction and different results and transitions utilized. For these outcomes, we don’t have the CPU’s IGP on, however in our testing it didn’t appear to matter both manner.

The winner is once more the Core i9-12900Okay which is available in about 14 p.c quicker than the Ryzen 9 5950X. It’s one other stable victory for the 12th-gen Core i9 and, frankly, one in an important class. People who drive Photoshop, Lightroom Classic, and Premiere Pro are in all probability one of many bigger energy customers teams on a desktop PC in addition to players.

IDG

AI efficiency

Our subsequent class is the fast paced area of AI in picture processing. Our first take a look at is one thing we’ve been taking part in with for just a few generations of CPUs: Topaz Lab’s Gigapixel AI, which makes use of AI to extend the decision of a picture with much more constancy than easier algorithms. For this work load, we take an 8.2 megapixel picture of an F-16 Falcon shot on a DSLR a decade in the past and improve its decision by 6x. We permit the appliance to obtain the most recent AI fashions for the upsample. We then time how lengthy it takes to carry out the motion 3 times. In the previous, we’ve seen Intel’s laptop computer chips lay waste to the competitors right here—Apple and AMD included. The outcomes right here, nevertheless, are slightly puzzling to us and arduous to parse. Like our earlier assessments, we run it with the IGP switched off, however even when switched on, the Core i9-12900Okay is definitely slightly slower than the outcomes proven beneath, taking 57 seconds.

It doesn’t assist that Topaz Labs rolls new variations of Gigapixel roughly each few weeks. Since this can be a quickly iterating expertise, we don’t really feel it will have been proper to make use of an older model both. In the top, the Ryzen 9 5950X finally ends up taking 20 p.c much less time than the Core i9-12900Okay to complete the duty at hand. That’s actually all that issues to anybody who makes use of it.

IDG

Our subsequent AI take a look at makes use of Nero’s Score 3.0 benchmark to measure photograph tagging efficiency. That’s basically the identical cool (or creepy) factor your good cellphone does the place it is going to robotically tag photos for you. The excellent news is with Nero’s AI Photo Tagger (which is predicated on the identical engine), it’s completed in your PC the place you preserve management. The utility and benchmark are primarily based on Intel’s OpenVINO framework.

Unlike Topaz, we see Nero Score’s CPU AI tagging giving Intel’s elements a hefty 45 p.c benefit over its Ryzen counterpart. Which quantity ought to consider to foretell the place AI goes to fall? Probably someplace between them. Intel has poured a lot cash and treasure into OpenVino that makes this benefit actual, in spite of everything. It ought to be tempered, nevertheless, with the fact that the one factor that issues is utility assist to make {that a} actuality. And clearly generally it’s quicker on AMD chips, as Topaz confirmed.

IDG

Real world efficiency

People might fantasize about making a particular results for his or her indie film or modifying pictures from unique journeys, however the overwhelming majority of the world is definitely extra involved with the boring stuff that pays the payments. For that, we have now Microsoft Office efficiency, which we measure utilizing UL’s Procyon 2.0 Office Productivity take a look at. Like the Adobe facet, it’s primarily based on tasking Microsoft Word, Excel, PointPoint, and Outlook with pretty superior and media-rich work. It’s about as actual as you may get, as a result of actual means boring.

For those that drive Office and get off on crisp, crisp Outlook efficiency, the benefit goes to the Core i9-12900Okay, which clocks in 16 p.c quicker than its Ryzen rival. Diving into every of the person purposes, Procyon locations the 12th-gen Core i9 at 14 p.c quicker in Word, 19 p.c quicker in Excel, 10 p.c quicker in PowerLevel, and 19 p.c quicker in Outlook.

IDG

Our final real-world take a look at makes use of Google Chrome 95 and runs three standard browser-based benchmarks: WebXprt 3.0, JetStream and Speedometer. WebXprt 3.0 simulates an array of browser-based duties resembling photograph enhancement, inventory possibility pricing, on-line homework, and an OCR scan. The outcomes are nearly a wash with the 12th-gen Core i9 being about 3 p.c quicker than the Ryzen 9 5950X total.

The Intel chip pulls in a greater win in JetStream 2 although, which measures JavaScript and WebAssembly peformance. The take a look at really combines parts of as soon as standard, however now deserted assessments resembling SunSpider, Octane 2, JetStream 1, and some others. The excellent news for the Core i9-12900Okay is a transparent efficiency fringe of 15 p.c, which ought to result in slightly crisper efficiency over Ryzen.

The remaining browser take a look at, Speedometer 2.0, provides the 12th-gen Core i9 much more of a bonus. The take a look at is pretty gentle weight and is designed to measure the responsiveness of an online app by “timing simulated user interactions.” The Intel chip has a 21 p.c greater rating which, once more, ought to result in barely snappier really feel in a browser over a Ryzen chip.

IDG

Gaming efficiency

We’ll shut out our utility efficiency testing in a class that’s in all probability a very powerful to many, however we frankly see as rather less grounded in precise actuality: Gaming. It’s not that we don’t suppose gaming is necessary—as a result of it’s—it’s simply that specializing in it generally ignores what’s occurring. First, for our sport testing, we caught with a 1080p panel with a 240Hz refresh charge, which might be the optimum circumstances the place a quicker CPU would matter.

Overall, if we needed to declare a winner, it will be the Core i9-12900Okay. There had been definitely just a few ties in our outcomes however by and enormous, the wins lean in the direction of the 12th-gen Core i9 over the Ryzen 9 5950X. We noticed the 12900Okay with sufficient double-digit leads that to say in any other case could be flawed.

Does it actually matter? No, not likely. Gaming remains to be largely sure by how briskly of a GPU you’ve got, and worrying a few Core i9-12900Okay vs. a Ryzen 9 5950X in all probability doesn’t yield the return on funding you’d suppose it will. They’re each spectacular gaming choices. Your time could be higher spent attempting to simply rating a fast graphics card.

With that mentioned, you simply wish to know what the very best CPU is gaming is, and we declare it to be the Intel Core i9-12900Okay.

IDG

Power consumption

Before we wrap this up, we do wish to dig into the ability consumption of Intel’s 12th gen Core i9 chip. Rumors have been working rampant that the CPU could be a fuel guzzler, and it may be—however solely while you mash the fuel pedal to the ground on an all-core load. The precise reply is much more nuanced. To measure this we took our two methods outfitted with the identical quantity of RAM, the identical mannequin coolers, the identical mannequin GPUs, the identical mannequin PSUs, and the the identical mannequin SSDS and concurrently measured how a lot energy they devour on the wall. Sure, you say you wish to know the way a lot the CPU alone consumes, however that’s not the way you pay your energy invoice.

We ought to notice that the size on the vertical axis of the primary chart really runs from 60 watts to 340 watts and the 0 is for the horizontal axis for time. We first run Cinenbench R20 utilizing all cores, and you’ll see the 12900Okay (purple) pushes a complete consumption of 320 watts—or almost 100 extra watts than the Ryzen 9 5950X (purple) pushed to the max. That’s about 45 p.c extra energy. Once each chips are completed with Cinebench on all cores, we run the chips utilizing a single-core or thread. We now see the whole system energy of the 12th-gen Core i9 within the 115 watt vary, whereas the Ryzen 9 consumes about 10 watts extra. You may see the Core i9 finishes the take a look at quicker after which idles utilizing much less energy than the Ryzen 9 system.

IDG

To see the way it performs out in a extra sensible take a look at, we then concurrently recorded the ability consumption of each methods whereas Procyon 2.0 is working Photoshop and Lightroom Classic. You can see the Ryzen 9 is definitely utilizing extra energy than the 12th gen Core i9 in each purposes. The upshot is that sure, the 12th-gen Core i9 can certainly guzzle down the electrical energy, however in precise sensible use, it tends to be pretty power environment friendly.

IDG

Thread scaling

We’re going to shut this out the place we started: Cinebench. For this analysis, we run Cinebench R20 from one thread to the utmost variety of threads every CPU has. We do that as a result of not all purposes use all cores, nor a single core. You might discover a combine so, this lets us visualize the place the benefit could be for a specific CPU.

We’re going to borrow from our 11th-gen Core i9-11900Okay overview outcomes. Even although they’re on Windows 10, it shouldn’t change an excessive amount of in a pure CPU Cinebench R20 take a look at like this.

The generational efficiency change from Intel’s 11th-gen to the 12th-gen is nothing lower than phenomenal. Using a single-thread, the Core i9-12900Okay is 42 p.c quicker than its predecessor and simply climbs from there. By the time we max out the last-gen Core i9 at its eight threads, the 12th gen Core i9 is a jaw-dropping 82 p.c quicker. It’s a completely beautiful change from the 11th-gen chip that was simply launched by Intel in March. While we don’t have have direct energy traces, we are able to inform you the older 11th-gen Core i9-11900Okay used almost 380 watts to run Cinebench R20, whereas the 12th gen Core i9 is round 320 watts. So it’s considerably quicker whereas utilizing far much less energy too.

IDG

While it comes as no shock that Intel’s older 11th-gen Core will get totally pummeled by the brand new 12th-gen chip, what issues extra is how the Intel Core i9-12900Okay compares in opposition to AMD’s mighty Ryzen 9 5950X. With 16-cores of Zen 3 goodness, that is no pushover like 11th-gen Core i9. The outcomes, the truth is, are loads nearer after we run Cinebench R20 from a single-thread to the utmost quantity of every chip, however clearly one is usually higher—and that’s the Core i9-12900Okay.

What’s actually fascinating is to see the 18 to 26 p.c lead from one core to eight cores on the 12900Okay. At that time, the 12th-gen Core i9 runs out of its high-performance cores and we presume Windows 11 begins throwing work on the effectivity cores. No matter: It’s sufficient to maintain the 12900Okay forward of the Ryzen 9 5950X. Both are useless even by the point the bodily cores of each are reached at 16 threads. But then the 12th gen Core i9 will get a second wind and reaches its peak efficiency at its full 24 threads. The Ryzen 9 does in the end finish Cinebench R20 with the identical rating, however for a lot of of these lighter hundreds, the 12th-gen Core i9-12900Okay ought to cleared the path.

IDG

Intel Core i9-12900Okay conclusion

Here’s a secret: There is not any such factor because the “best” CPU. 

Instead, it’s actually about what the very best CPU is on your explicit wants. To parse that out of the hundreds of phrases we’ve simply written, we’ll break it down into six classes that matter, and which chip gained each. The excellent news for Intel is that it’s sitting fairly in nearly each class.

Rendering / High-thread depend

In the high-thread depend purposes and rendering, the Core i9-12900Okay wrung out some spectacular as hell wins, resembling Cinebench R23, however sufficient of the outcomes we noticed in different CPU-rendering outcomes makes this much more nuanced. Frankly, if we had been selecting a chip for a 90 p.c rendering PC, the Ryzen 9 5950X might be the higher alternative. Winner: Ryzen 9 5950X.

Content creation

As we’ve seen, content material creation isn’t nearly having probably the most threads, and the 12th-gen Core i9 has all the things from a good to glorious efficiency bump over the Ryzen 9 5950X. If you principally drive Photoshop, Lightroom Classic or Premiere Pro, the higher alternative goes to be Intel. Winner: Core i9-12900Okay.

Real-world

The benchmarks in each Office productiveness and Chrome inform us the extra responsive CPU can be Intel’s. We absolutely consider that, however we additionally consider {that a} Ryzen 9 5950X can drive each use instances simply high-quality. And, nicely, if you happen to’re constructing a high-end desktop rig to run Outlook, Word and browse the Internet because the primary factor—you would in all probability take it just a few notches down.  Winner: Core i9-12900Okay.

Gaming

We’ve mentioned we predict you need to focus extra on the GPU than the CPU for real-world gaming good points, however in our gaming assessments, Intel’s 12th-gen Core i9 clearly notches extra wins or matches than the Ryzen half. Yes, it’s the “best gaming CPU” however you actually can’t go flawed with both. “Winner”: Core i9-12900Okay.

Features

Intel’s 12th-gen platform ushers within the new world of PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 reminiscence. It’s additionally extra more likely to get you Thunderbolt if you happen to want it and even has built-in Wi-Fi 6E. Sure, some will say DDR5 isn’t price it at the moment, and that’s truthful, however there’s sufficient newness right here that it will merely be flawed to not declare this one for Intel. Winner: Core i9-12900Okay.

Value

Some nonetheless suppose AMD’s Ryzen 9 5950X wasn’t a terrific worth, whereas others suppose a $750 CPU that supplied efficiency on par with a $2,000 CPU from the 12 months earlier than was a steal. If you’re within the camp that thinks the Ryzen 9 value was a steal, than Intel’s aggressive $589 pricing of the Core i9-12900Okay could have you screaming for the corporate to take your debit card. Yes, the worth is the majority value, however historically, the 1,000 unit “tray” pricing is inside {dollars} of the road value as soon as preliminary demand settles. So sure, hell has frozen over as a result of the worth winner right here is Intel. Winner: Core i9-12900Okay.

In the top, the Core i9-12900Okay is a shocking return to greatness and one hell of a formidable CPU. Alder Lake was well worth the wait. Bravo, Intel.