Intel’s Core 285H chip, the primary member of its Core Ultra 200 or “Arrow Lake-H” household for laptops, has a giant crater to fill. Yes, crater: This processor basically bombed on the desktop. In laptops, nevertheless, Intel’s Core 285H chip helps redeem Intel’s repute, starring within the in any other case pedestrian MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo (B2HMG) laptop computer.
Consider this to be two evaluations for the value of 1: I’ll check out the MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo itself, a pattern of a laptop computer that has but to start formally delivery. But many of the efficiency assessments I’ll run are for the aim of evaluating Intel’s Core Ultra 285H and the Arrow Lake-H structure to one of the best that AMD and Qualcomm have to supply, plus Intel’s older cell chips.
The quick reply: Intel blows away its earlier “Lunar Lake” chips, the Core Ultra 200V. The new Core Ultra 200H chips basically double the efficiency usually functions due to a ton of extra cores. But, hampered by its lack of a contemporary NPU, Intel is pressured to mumble and kick the bottom with regards to speaking about AI.
At press time, I couldn’t discover any retailers that marketed the Prestige 16 AI Evo (B2HMG) on the market, and MSI’s own listing for the laptop computer simply references numerous abroad suppliers. MSI expenses about $1,620 for the Prestige 16 AI EVO B1MG, which was the debut laptop computer for our tests of the Core Ultra 100-series chips, or Meteor Lake, in Feb. 2024.
Mark Hachman / IDG
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo (B2HMG): Specs and options
- Display: 16-inch 3840×2400 OLED @60Hz
- Processor: “Up to” Core 7 200H, Core 9 285H as examined
- Graphics: Intel Arc 140T
- NPU: Yes, 13 TOPS
- Memory: 32GB LPDDR5x-7500
- Storage: 1TB (2x M.2 SSD slots, NVMe PCIe Gen 4)
- Ports: 2 USB-C (Thunderbolt 4, DisplayPort/Power Delivery 3.0); 1 HDMI 2.1, 1 USB-A 10Gbps, 1 SD (XC/HC card reader), Gigabit Ethernet, Kensington lock
- Camera: 1080p, 30 fps (user-facing)
- Battery: 99.9Wh
- Wireless: Intel Killer BE Wi-Fi 7/ Bluetooth 5.4
- Operating system: Windows 11 Home/Pro (Windows 11 Home as examined)
- Dimensions (inches): 14.11 x 10.02 x 0.75 in. (16.9-19.0mm)
- Weight: 3.31 lbs.
- Color: Stellar Gray
- Price: Unknown
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo (B2HMG): Design, construct high quality, show and ports
Intel despatched us an engineering pattern of the MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo (B2HMG) for assessment, as a check mattress for the Core Ultra 9 285H (Arrow Lake-H) chip inside.
You’re not going to search out too many variations between the Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG and earlier fashions just like the 2024 MSI Prestige 16 B1MG, which housed the Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel’s first entrant into its cell Core Ultra household. As reviewer Matt Smith famous of the B1MG, this B2HMG is a completely mainstream, relatively nondescript, plasticky laptop computer most notable for what’s inside. It’s not an enormous shock that the mannequin is used as a showcase for Intel’s new chips.
Structurally, the magnesium-aluminum laptop computer doesn’t fairly have the robustness you’d anticipate from a purely aluminum chassis, although I actually didn’t discover any keyboard flex. I didn’t discover any show flex both, though opening and shutting the system feels a bit flimsy.
I wouldn’t thoughts if MSI shaved a number of tenths of a pound off of the load, however 3.3 kilos isn’t egregious for a mainstream laptop computer. I’ve stopped worrying about laptop computer thicknesses, largely, however the chassis is thick sufficient to accommodate an Ethernet port, which is all the time a pleasant contact.
About the one factor that feels off to me are the rear-mounted ports. I do know there’s an argument to be made that snaking the facility cable (which takes up one of many two USB-C/Thunderbolt ports on the rear of the machine) from behind can save house. The identical holds for putting the HDMI port on the rear. But it feels bizarre in my very own setup, during which the laptop computer sits on my desk’s keyboard drawer, with its display screen nestled just below a desktop show. I all the time fear about crimping the cords or bending the USB-C port itself.
Mark Hachman / IDG
Aside from the SD slot, Ethernet, and headphone jack on the precise aspect of the chassis, the Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG makes use of the left aspect for venting scorching air that’s pulled in from a grille beneath the laptop computer itself. I hardly ever heard the followers spin as much as peak ranges. Most of the time, if the laptop computer wanted to chill itself, the followers ran at only a mild hiss.
The fan response time appears fast as nicely; over time I’ve merely anticipated the followers to ramp up and keep that approach by means of benchmark assessments. That wasn’t the case right here, with the followers turning on and off as wanted.
Maybe I’m jaded, however I’ve come to anticipate high-refresh price shows. This laptop computer doesn’t have one — simply the default 60Hz — which looks like a step down if you happen to’ve used a quicker one. Thankfully, MSI added an OLED show to the Prestige 16 AI Evo, which all the time provides a sure je ne sais quoi when watching motion pictures, the place OLED’s implausible distinction helps the colours pop. I’m assuming you’ve used an OLED show earlier than; if you happen to haven’t, you’re in for an actual deal with.
Mark Hachman / IDG
There’s a tradeoff, nevertheless, and that’s the show decision: 2560 x 1600.
As the numbers counsel, the show gives extra pixels than a 1440p show, however falls wanting a real 3840×2160 (4K) show. I couldn’t assist however marvel why the sooner B1MG provided a beautiful 3840×2400 show, and this didn’t. Pushing pixels does have an effect on efficiency, nevertheless. (At the time of my assessment of Intel’s Core 100 chip, Intel and MSI despatched me an engineering pattern of the B1MG with the identical 1600p show as within the B2HMG, and never the 2400p show that was a part of our B1MG assessment.)
Mark Hachman / IDG
As all the time, a number of the most helpful performance hides throughout the system utility software program. MSI calls its app MSI Center, and it permits fast toggles between efficiency modes in addition to entry to options like the power to cap charging at 80 p.c to protect battery life, what occurs when the lid is closed, and so forth. MSI doesn’t provide almost as many capabilities as, say, Asus, nevertheless it’s nonetheless value a tour to find noise cancellation applied sciences and the place to search out firmware updates that aren’t coated by Windows Update itself.
Our engineering pattern didn’t include any bloatware in addition to Norton 365, which I needed to take away as a result of it interfered with my benchmark software program.
There are a few different options value noting: assist for the very newest Wi-Fi 7, which can be quicker than your personal broadband connection, in addition to a neat function that makes use of the webcam to place the laptop computer into sleep mode while you stroll away. The latter function isn’t new, however not each vendor gives it.
Mark Hachman / IDG
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo (B2HMG): Keyboard and trackpad
The MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo (B2HMG) gives a full keyboard plus a trackpad, which is all the time to be applauded for lefty avid gamers. A biometric login additionally hides behind the facility button. Windows and Windows Hello want that you just log in with a depth digital camera (and sure, there may be one) so that you is perhaps unaware that it exists. I like logging in with my face, however shaving or only a unhealthy hair day can typically mess it up. Set up each and chances are high that you just’ll by no means have to make use of a PIN as a backup once more.
Everything concerning the MSI laptop computer expertise is type of meh, so it’s mildly pleasant to find that the Prestige’s keyboard is comfy and a pleasure to sort upon. The keys are springy, even when they really feel a mite small. The quantity pad is a bit narrower than a full-sized exterior keyboard, however that’s only a minor nitpick. A row of operate keys on the high of the keyboard doesn’t disguise any surprises, and consists of keys to chop off the mic and digital camera. (There can also be a bodily webcam shutter.)
There are three ranges of backlighting, which might be configured to routinely flip off in 10 seconds by way of MSI Center. The default mode is “auto off,” which doesn’t actually present any extra clarification. It appears to depend on whether or not it detects you.
I actually didn’t discover this function earlier than performing some battery longevity assessments that put the laptop computer close to me every so often. The battery lifetime of this laptop computer remains to be wonderful, however my outcomes assorted by about 90 minutes. This could possibly be why.
Mark Hachman / IDG
A large (6×3.5 inches) trackpad on the backside of the laptop computer, and barely offset, is clickable almost to the highest. It doesn’t use haptics, as some laptops now do, to simulate the typing expertise.
MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo (B2HMG): Webcam, audio system, and biometrics
The mixture of the fingerprint reader behind the facility button and the extra Windows Hello webcam looks like a pleasant one-two punch of biometric redundancy. Fingerprint sensors can accumulate grime, and biometric cameras don’t all the time tolerate modifications in your look. But MSI’s strategy labored nicely throughout my restricted assessment interval.
The webcam is fairly awful. I’d wager that MSI inbuilt a 1080p, 30fps webcam, then tacked Microsoft’s Windows Studio Effects on high of it. One of the options is the power to do “pan and zoom,” in order that the webcam follows your face because it strikes round. In actuality, the webcam is just cropping in to search out your face, which discards a number of the 1080p pixels. In essence, you’re taking a 1080p webcam and cropping right down to one thing akin to a 720p webcam as a substitute.
Mark Hachman / IDG
My face ended up washed out and fuzzy (no beard jokes, please) when down in my workplace, and never a lot better upstairs in additional pure mild. I assessment the best webcams for laptops particularly for laptops like this.
You can slide the webcam shutter closed with a bodily mechanism close to the digital camera module itself.
One of probably the most underrated AI features on laptops is their ability to filter out and enhance audio, by way of a mixture of a number of microphones, the laptop computer’s spatial consciousness of them and what they will seize, and numerous AI enhancements. Again, this function hides contained in the MSI Center app, and particularly the AI Zone tab.
Turning on the “Studio EQ” makes an infinite distinction in how your voice sounds, giving it heat and a few timbre, like knowledgeable mic. Enabling the associated “Conference Enhancer” audio mode and the “Front” (exact) mode captured my voice nicely, and completely erased the tapping and rattling of a spoon in a bowl only a foot or so to my proper. Absolutely spectacular stuff.
It’s relatively disappointing, then, that the audio system are gentle and mushy. Yes, there’s AI filtering right here as nicely, however MSI must beef up the fundamentals.
Mark Hachman / IDG
What you’ll want to know concerning the Core 200H (Arrow Lake-H)
Normally, our laptop computer evaluations give attention to a number of key benchmarks. But since that is the primary likelihood PCWorld has needed to check these new Arrow Lake-H cell processors, I’m going to dedicate more room than I usually would to numerous assessments.
First, a quick recap. Intel announced both the Arrow Lake-H and Arrow Lake-HX processor families at CES in January. The Core Ultra 9 285H is the quickest chip in Intel’s cell H-series chip in the intervening time, topping out at 2.90GHz.
The Arrow Lake-H household combines “next-gen” Lion Cove efficiency cores and Skymont effectivity cores, present in Lunar Lake, however with an addition: the ultra-low-power E-cores discovered within the Meteor Lake structure. Within the Core Ultra 9 285H, they line up in a 6-8-2 configuration, with 6 efficiency cores, 8 effectivity cores, and a pair of the low-power E-cores. The chip additionally consists of the second-gen Arc GPU core discovered throughout the Arrow Lake desktop processor, whose NPU solely supplies 13 TOPS of AI energy. The MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo might have AI in its identify, however it’s not a Copilot+-class PC.
Intel has positioned the Arrow Lake-H household as “tweener” chip, powering a center class between Lunar Lake’s lengthy battery life and the gaming energy of the Core HX household, which is due by the tip of March. It’s a bit bizarre that Intel’s Core Ultra 7 258V (Lunar Lake) and Core Ultra 9 285H (Arrow Lake) are two fully totally different chip architectures with related mannequin numbers, however that’s an issue for Intel’s advertising division to resolve.
In this assessment, we’re utilizing for comparability Intel’s Core 100 (Meteor Lake) and Core 200V (Lunar Lake) chips, represented by the $1,649 MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo and the $1,499 Asus Zenbook S 14, respectively. I’m additionally together with one other $1,699 Asus Zenbook S 16 with a Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 chip inside, in addition to a second model with an AI 9 365 chip. I’ve let the $1,999 Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 characterize the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite, with the $1,199 Microsoft Surface Pro 11th Edition dropping in the place it may.
Let’s be sincere: Arrow Lake was basically a catastrophe on the desktop. Intel promised “parity” performance on the desktop at half the power, however didn’t ship. The Arrow Lake-S desktop chips wanted a battery of patches and firmware updates to revive the anticipated efficiency, up to an additional 25 percent in some cases. (Those are all accounted for on the cell platform, Intel says.) Will the elevated emphasis on decrease energy play higher within the laptop computer house? We’ll see.
For this assessment, I’ve targeted testing on the three key segments of the Core Ultra 9 285H: the CPU, GPU, and NPU, evaluating Intel’s newest to the consultant samples of Intel’s prior Core Ultra 100 (Meteor Lake) and Core Ultra 200 (Lunar Lake) chips, in addition to AMD’s Ryzen AI 300 and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X Elite processors.
I’ve run the assessments each on wall energy and on battery, as in some circumstances the efficiency can drop pretty considerably. Though I depart the laptops on their default energy settings, I additionally ran our check laptop computer on the “Best Performance” setting simply to see if it made any distinction. Those are famous by the “MAX” label within the the assessments beneath. MSI’s laptop computer additionally has an non-obligatory “AI Engine” that’s tucked away in its MSI Center utility, bundled with the laptop computer. I acquired it with that choice turned off; I left it off. I’d anticipate that turning it on would put the efficiency someplace between the default settings and the utmost efficiency choice, each of which I’ve examined.
The outcomes, sadly, are a bit patchy. Because of my colleague Gordon Mah Ung’s premature demise, a small variety of assessments weren’t accomplished on the Asus Zenbook S 16 and its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 chip that he had in his possession. Rather than intrude on the household, we requested AMD for a substitute.
AMD representatives by accident despatched over a laptop computer with a barely slower AI 9 365 chip inside as a substitute. Though the names are related, the AI HX 370 has 12 cores (4 Zen 5, 8 Zen 5c) and runs at as much as 5.1GHz; the AI 9 365 consists of 10 cores (4 Zen 5, and 6 Zen 5c) and runs at 5GHz. We’ve examined each, and our outcomes seem beneath.
Some of the early AI assessments don’t actually accommodate the vary of the brand new Ryzen’s capabilities, so that you’ll discover some gaps there, nevertheless. Finally, it seems that a latest replace to Adobe Photoshop might have damaged the Pugetbench benchmark, a check I wished to make use of to point out off how nicely the chip runs Photoshop. The benchmark wouldn’t run.
Intel Core 200H: CPU benchmarks
The conventional metrics of CPU testing are Cinebench and Geekbench, which push the CPU to its limits in a chronic burst. With gobs of cores, the Core Ultra 9 285H contained in the MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo (B2HMG) helps it kick butt within the all-cores, all-threads assessments — greater than doubling the efficiency from Lunar Lake!
Mark Hachman / IDG
Cinebench R23 and Cinebench 2024 are variations on the identical check, with the latter model ramping up its depth to problem the extra superior chips. These two assessments basically render a 2D scene, utilizing the codebase that underlies the Maxon Cinema 4D visible FX utility. Geekbench performs numerous related stress assessments upon the CPU, however does much more behind the scenes.
Though the multicore scores present a transparent win for Intel’s Arrow Lake-H and the Core Ultra 9 285H, the single-core scores are a lot nearer. Here, I’ve to notice that the facility settings make a distinction. Again, I depart the facility settings on the default ranges, and the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 849 in my multicore Cinebench 2024 assessments. Gordon’s earlier tests of the chip dialed up the facility settings throughout the board, the place the Ryzen scored a 982.
Mark Hachman / IDG
AMD, Qualcomm, and Intel are a lot nearer in single-core efficiency… however once more, it’s a transparent win for Intel on this spherical.
You’ll discover in a number of circumstances that the “maximum” energy setting truly underperforms the usual setting. We additionally sometimes see circumstances the place the efficiency on battery even outperforms the chip on wall energy. We’ve seen these types of anomalies for a number of generations now; they’re uncommon, however they do occur.
Geekbench assessments the CPU in addition to the GPU, so there’s a little bit of foreshadowing within the purple bars of the GPU testing right here.
Mark Hachman / IDG
UL’s PCMark 10 is definitely one among my favourite benchmarks, because it encompasses every part from video to CAD work to workplace testing. The downside is that Windows on Arm machines powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon journey and fall over one of many assessments, invalidating the entire run. The same check utilizing the UL’s Procyon suite asks the laptop computer to carry out numerous work duties particularly designed round 4 Microsoft Office/Microsoft 365 functions: Word, Excel, PowerLevel, and Outlook.
Procyon’s workplace benchmark may not be too intensive, nevertheless it’s additionally a real-world sign of how this laptop computer and the Core Ultra 200H chip will carry out. What pursuits me about this check is that it makes use of all real-world utility, however efficiency nonetheless drops off sharply on battery — greater than different assessments I ran.
Mark Hachman / IDG
Handbrake is a transcoding utility, with a real-world, sensible punch. In my earlier testing of the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite, I downloaded a latest model to present the chip a good likelihood to compete, and I’ve carried out the identical with the Core Ultra 200H. (Previously we’ve used an older, unoptimized model for consistency.)
Handbrake gives tons of configuration settings. For this check, I used a fast, standardized preset and re-ran our earlier outcomes on the brand new settings. Here, a decrease rating is healthier, because it signifies the duty accomplished quicker. Again, the Core Ultra 200H wins, however not by that a lot over the Ryzen. (I’m fairly assured that the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 would have taken this check, however I didn’t have the laptop computer to show it.)
Mark Hachman / IDG
Again, I might have appreciated to have examined Pugetbench’s standardized Photoshop check, nevertheless it wouldn’t run.
Intel Core 200H: GPU and gaming benchmarks
Intel has by no means positioned the Core Ultra 200H platform as a gaming PC, however Intel and its rivals are providing highly effective sufficient built-in graphics that probably provide the aptitude to play some older video games at low settings. AMD, particularly, gives a powerful competitor with its built-in 980M GPUs. Does the Arrow Lake-H have sufficient to maintain up?
We check graphics utilizing simulated benchmarks: UL’s 3DMark suite. The Time Spy check maintains consistency with our established database of historic benchmarks, whereas the extra superior Steel Nomad Light check is designed for extra fashionable PCs.
Mark Hachman / IDG
This is a aggressive benchmark, with all three chip distributors performing nicely right here. I’m additionally impressed that the efficiency doesn’t drop a lot when the laptops are disconnected from wall energy and run on battery.
Still, video games are the actual check. The well-liked recreation Cyberpunk: 2077 scales nicely throughout the board, and it’s check of every part from body era to ray tracing. In this case, Intel has mentioned that XeSS 2.0, which injects AI frames to clean body charges, was “backported” to the Core 200H’s GPU. But whereas greater than 150 video games reportedly assist XeSS 1.0, solely Marvel Rivals and F1 2024 at the moment assist XeSS 2.0. That limits the chip’s attraction considerably. (Though F1 has a “benchmark mode,” it merely tracks the body price on an on-screen counter, which makes it robust to gauge.)
Although Intel recommends that you just check out gaming on the chip at Medium settings, we caught with Low settings to eke out one of the best body price. After watching the benchmark for Cyberpunk, I’d contemplate the 40-ish frames per second not too unhealthy, though my most popular gaming setup can attain a lot larger. Most avid gamers want a minimum of 60fps for clean gaming, and the laptop computer doesn’t fairly hit that, even at most energy. AMD’s Ryzen is the king right here.
Mark Hachman / IDG
The identical factor occurred with the opposite recreation in our check bench, Shadow of the Tomb Raider. On Low settings it got here nearer to our goal of 60fps, however didn’t obtain it. Just out of curiosity, I attempted the Highest graphics setting and achieved simply 33 frames per second.
I don’t suppose you can name the MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo (B2HMG) fairly able to gaming by itself.
Mark Hachman / IDG
Intel Core Ultra 200H: AI benchmarks
AI benchmarking remains to be in a nascent stage. Chip distributors like Intel are hoping for a day while you’ll run native AI functions like AI artwork and LLM/AI chatbots immediately in your PC, and that day is certainly right here. However, the high quality of the AI output remains to be closely depending on whether or not your laptop computer has a robust graphics card, or a extra environment friendly NPU; and whether or not the fashions getting used are sufficiently small to suit on a PC. You’ll additionally want to make sure that the applying is coded in your chip’s structure.
That final level is the snare that’s nonetheless hampering each Qualcomm and AMD. Although extra functions are supporting each chip architectures — Microsoft has developed Copilot+ functions virtually solely with Snapdragon chips in thoughts — Intel has leaned arduous into capturing AI builders.
What this implies is that lots of the standardized assessments both don’t run on AMD or Qualcomm chips, or else don’t take full benefit. On the opposite hand, a number of the apps faucet into each the GPU and the NPU on Intel’s processors, a future that Intel has eagerly anticipated. The backside line is that it’s not straightforward to discover a check that may put all three chip architectures on a degree taking part in subject, if the app helps all three chip architectures within the first place. These assessments mainly simply evaluate generation-over-generation efficiency with Intel’s personal chips.
In these assessments, I turned on assist for every processor the place I might. Intel, for instance, ran utilizing in a devoted OpenVINO mode, whereas Qualcomm used SNPE. AMD’s Ryzen AI solely had a NPU accessible, and it reported that the devoted NPU driver wasn’t loaded. But that didn’t appear to matter, given its rating.
Mark Hachman / IDG
Remember, Arrow Lake-H is just not a Copilot+ chip, and when you could find an utility like UL’s Procyon Vision (which seems to be at how nicely a laptop computer processor can inference, or do work on, numerous machine studying fashions) Intel doesn’t come out on high.
Procyon Image Generation gives picture fashions of various complexities. Here, the laptop computer is definitely creating eight 512×512 pictures utilizing an 8-bit integer mannequin. (Higher complexity, reminiscent of a FP16 mannequin, takes longer however produces higher pictures.) Here, every picture takes about 20 seconds to provide.
Lunar Lake is dominant right here, with its GPU and NPU working collectively. Since the choice to have each work collectively was there, I turned it on; it felt extra practical. The AMD and Qualcomm chips didn’t run.
Mark Hachman / IDG
You’re most likely accustomed to Google Gemini or Microsoft Copilot or ChatGPT; all are what’s referred to as LLMs, or massive language fashions. Chip distributors hope that you just’ll finally use a compressed, much less advanced Small Language Model, or SLM, by yourself machine.
MLCommons developed its own test, utilizing the Llama 2 7B massive language mannequin (LLM) from Meta. The check downloads the mannequin after which asks it to carry out content material era, inventive writing, and two summarization assessments. This check doesn’t hassle with a rating. Instead, it seems to be at two key, real-world metrics: the time to first token (or how lengthy the AI takes to reply to your question), and the variety of tokens per second.
If you’re unfamiliar with AI, a “token” is the important thing unit of measurement. A token is rather less than a phrase: “some” requires a token, as does “2” or “6”. “Something” would require two tokens, because it’s basically a compound phrase. When an AI chatbot responds to a question, it spits out textual content like a dot-matrix printer: You can see the phrases crawl throughout the display screen on a regionally operating LLM. How “fast” the result’s actually relies on how shortly you learn.
Mark Hachman / IDG
I used Procyon’s model of an identical check to spherical out my AI testing. Although this check additionally supplies time-to-first-token and token-per-second benchmarks, I used the general rating as a substitute. This check downloads 4 fashions, not one, and compares the efficiency on all 4.
Unfortunately, the check wouldn’t run on Arm or AMD Ryzen processors. The output is a bit messy, however Intel’s Lunar Lake wins once more.
Mark Hachman / IDG
Evaluating battery life is a holistic train, the place the laptop computer, its chip, show, cooling, and battery all play some position. Of the laptops I’ve examined above, right here’s how the battery life shapes up: glorious throughout the board. I set the show luminance on the identical degree for all laptops, than used the UL’s battery rundown check that basically loops its workplace benchmark again and again till the battery expires — simulating a marathon all-nighter of labor.
- Asus 14 OLED (Intel Lunar Lake): 17 hours, 7 minutes
- Surface Laptop seventh Edition (Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite): 16 hours, 20 minutes
- Asus ZenEbook S 16 (AMD Ryzen AI 300): 10 hours, 42 minutes
- Asus ZenEbook 14 OLED (Intel Meteor Lake): 10 hours, 35 minutes
To that, the MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo (B2HMG) with the Arrow Lake-H chip inside recorded between 15 hours, 10 minutes and 16 hours, 33 minutes of battery life, with a median of about 15 hours, 50 minutes over a number of runs. That’s excellent, as is the battery lifetime of just about all of those laptops.
Conclusion: Should you purchase a laptop computer with a Core Ultra 200H chip?
I’m satisfied that, sure, you need to. As a general-purpose PC processor, Intel’s Arrow Lake-H chip soars to the highest of the heap in most assessments, dramatically outperforming Intel’s Lunar Lake chips — which, to be honest, weren’t particularly designed with as a lot efficiency in thoughts.
Instead, the Core Ultra 200V household was designed particularly for lengthy battery life plus AI efficiency, which is the place Intel’s Arrow Lake-H chips nonetheless fall quick. But basing our battery-life testing on the Procyon Office benchmark, which constantly throws Microsoft Office duties on the laptop computer, makes me really feel way more assured in saying that you just’ll get excess of a typical workday’s workload out of the MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo (B2HMG) and its Arrow Lake-H chip within it.
(Remember, the MSI Prestige 16 AI Evo (B2HMG) itself is an engineering pattern that’s not accessible on the market. I’m comparatively ambivalent towards it proper now — it’s good, however doesn’t actually make my coronary heart ache to make use of it.)
Mark Hachman / IDG
I nonetheless suppose that each one three laptop computer platforms — AMD, Intel, and Qualcomm — are on the high of their recreation proper now, pushing arduous. If you need completely killer battery life and unbelievable standby efficiency, contemplate a Snapdragon laptop computer. AMD’s Ryzen platform, in the meantime, excels in most duties, together with gaming. Intel’s Lunar Lake Core Ultra 200V chips are nonetheless most likely your best option for each battery life and a few AI duties, with the Core Ultra 200H taking on for common productiveness. The Core Ultra 200H doesn’t seem to fairly have the chops to function a gaming processor, and lacks enough NPU TOPS to essentially run NPU-dependent AI apps.
Right now, Intel’s benefit appears to be that every part runs Intel, giving it a way that it’s the all-around processor you want. Real life bends extra in direction of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon, a minimum of the place Windows’ AI apps are involved.
If I needed to choose one of the best laptop computer chip in the intervening time, nevertheless, I’d nonetheless lean towards AMD’s Ryzen AI 300 processor. It’s not the highest of the heap in most assessments, nevertheless it’s fairly shut in lots of, and rises to the highest in gaming and AI. I don’t suppose AMD’s problem proper now could be silicon, however software program: Its ROCm AI improvement setting doesn’t have the ubiquity Intel is tying to push with OpenVINO, and it reveals. If you’ll be able to’t run the app, it doesn’t matter how good the chip is.
I feel Intel’s dominance of the laptop computer market is nearing an finish, and as a substitute heading towards an age of relative parity between all three processor platforms. Nerds will nonetheless be capable to purchase the “best” laptop computer, however will probably be necessary to know what options you’re prioritizing, precisely. Intel’s Core Ultra 200H (Arrow Lake-H) seems to be exceptionally robust usually productiveness and battery life, two key options customers care deeply about. That will preserve Intel’s foes at bay, for now.