Pixel 3A vs. iPhone SE.
Ian Knighton/CNET
The iPhone SE is Apple’s new entry-level telephone. For $399 (£419, AU$749), you get a tool with the identical highly effective A13 processor because the $699 iPhone 11, packed into the physique of an iPhone 8. Equally spectacular, you get a digicam that is comparable in some ways to the 11, although with out a few bells and whistles. This is paying homage to Google’s Pixel 3A. Last 12 months, the 3A supplied the distinctive digicam in 2018’s Pixel 3 for simply $399. Which begs the query: Does Apple’s new entry-level digicam beat Google’s? In most instances, it certainly does.The two telephones have comparable digicam capabilities. Both are single-lens setups, uncommon in an age the place even funds telephones have two or three cameras on the again. As a end result, each lack ultrawide angle capabilities or a shooter devoted to optimizing zoom. (To get an iPhone with a telephoto lens, you may should shell out for an 11 Pro.) Both can shoot 4K video, too. Where they diverge most is at night time time: The 3A gives Night Sight, whereas the SE has no choice for bettering low-light situations. And certain sufficient, the Pixel 3A has a lot stronger night-time efficiency. Outside of that, although, the SE wins massive. 
iPhone SE’s commonplace images guidelinesThe pictures taken by the Pixel 3A are, usually, extra subdued than these captured by the iPhone SE. There are professionals and cons to this. The iPhone often suffers from overpowering highlights, whereas the Pixel is extra constant. But in my testing it was normally the iPhone that shot extra spectacular pictures. See how rather more vibrant this close-up shot of a flower is, for example. It appears to be like undersaturated and artificially cooled when captured by the Pixel 3A, and rather more energetic by means of the iPhone SE. It’s not all the time as one-sided as this, although. The banksia flower under is rather more putting as captured by the iPhone, for example, however the Pixel has some benefits. The greens are deeper, and the Pixel did a greater job at utilizing mild to separate fore- and background. For essentially the most half, although, that tendency for exuberance works within the iPhone’s favor. This espresso shot, barely embarrassing to absorb public, exemplifies one other dynamic: The Pixel tends to chill photos down, whereas the iPhone warms them up. It’s honest to have a subjective desire on which tone you like however, exterior of hue, the iPhone picture definitely pops extra. Again, there are occasions when the Pixel’s extra restrained images works in its favor. This picture of shrubbery (there’s not a lot to take pictures of apart from flowers and greenery proper now) has unwieldy lighting on the SE as in comparison with the extra balanced 3A, for example. But that picture is an outlier; of the handfuls of ordinary pictures I took with the 2 telephones, this shot under might be essentially the most consultant. Both telephones seize nice pictures, however the iPhone’s are extra dynamic and extra putting.Pixel Portraits vs. iPhone SEBoth the iPhone SE and Pixel 3A take distinctive portrait pictures. Yet there are variations. And right here, extra so than commonplace pictures, which you want extra will largely come down to non-public desire relatively than one digicam being higher than one other. A key distinction within the two is not about image high quality, however image taking. The Pixel 3A zooms in when it takes portraits — the shot under was taken from the very same distance. This is a sensible matter that makes the Pixel 3A barely much less versatile with regards to framing than the SE. (iPhones normally zoom in 2x as a default for Portrait mode, however the SE does not as a result of it has no telephoto lens.) You’ll discover within the above image that my housemate Dan’s hair, each the curls on prime and the beard under, are sharper and extra detailed within the Pixel’s seize. His pores and skin tone appears to be like slightly brushed within the iPhone shot, too. Also word how otherwise the 2 units captured his jumper. The iPhone’s inexperienced is extra correct.In the under pictures of Rachael, the Pixel’s rendition is extra balanced. But it is also flatter. Note how extra distinctly foregrounded she is within the iPhone shot. There’s some lack of element, as Rach’s eyes pop within the iPhone shot however you may barely see their shade within the Pixel picture. Her pores and skin additionally appears to be like extra pure within the iPhone portrait. The Pixel picture appears to be like like somebody took the Structure worth in an Instagram publish and pushed it up.iPhone SE (L) vs. Pixel 3a (R).
Daniel Van Boom/CNET
This is extra pronounced within the under portraits of Dynn. His pores and skin appears to be like a tiny bit brushed within the iPhone shot, however means too sharp and crisp within the Pixel 3A picture. The creases under his eyes appear to be notably unlucky outcomes of synthetic sharpening. Ultimately, which telephone takes a greater portrait shot relies upon totally on subjective style. I might give factors to the iPhone for extra consistency, although.Night Sight is kingWhen it involves low-light images, it is fairly easy. If we’re evaluating standing night-time pictures, the iPhone is normally barely higher. But the Pixel 3A has Night Sight, and the iPhone SE does not have the night time mode discovered on the 11 vary. If Night Sight is on, there is not any competitors.Take the under scene. The Pixel 3A arguably took a cooler image — the sparse mild produces an eerie impact — however the iPhone SE captured far more data. In the latter’s picture you may see extra of the mulch on the bottom, in addition to extra of the encircling bushes. These photos of gnocchi have been taken with some background lighting, not true night-time situations. The iPhone’s has significantly better distinction, and has a extra satisfying sharpness to it. The Pixel 3A, in the meantime, has one thing of an disagreeable tint on account of some white steadiness points. But then we get to the iPhone SE taking up the Pixel 3A with Night Sight turned on. It’s an entire new recreation, one which highlights how a lot of a blessing night time modes are. In the entire under instances, you may see Night Sight outclasses the iPhone SE’s (admirable) low-light efficiency.Zoom is iPhone SE’s weak pointYou’ll have to offer me some leeway with this one, as evaluating the zoom capabilities of the 2 telephones was one thing of an inexact science. The iPhone SE’s picture app provides you a zoom slider, however no corresponding quantity to let you know if you happen to’re 2x or 3x or 4x zoomed in. As a end result, the under pictures will not be 1:1 comparisons, since they’re unlikely to be exactly the identical degree of zoom. With that stated, the Pixel 3a appears to be like far forward of the iPhone SE. I imply this actually, because the 3a can go as much as 7x digital zoom and it looks as if the SE caps out at 5x. But the Pixel 3A additionally takes clearer zoomed-in pictures. In the above picture, round 2x zoom, the Pixel’s shot is far clearer and sharper. You’ll see this if you happen to look carefully on the greenery, but it surely hits you instantly as you look on the pink flowers.The under shot is round 4x zoom, of a bottle of wine I’ve been hiding from my housemates (drink responsibly, y’all). Admittedly, you may see I’ve zoomed a bit additional on the iPhone SE — however that there is a extensive distinction in image high quality that is unlikely to be defined by the small hole in zoom. The iPhone retains its heat, however appears to be like rather more noisy. This is very true whenever you take a look at the background.Finally, this water jug (beforehand full of beer — drink responsibly and so on.) was shot at 5x zoom on each telephones. The 3A’s shot is far clearer. I’m anxious to say something too decisive, since once more I am unable to be 100% certain in regards to the zoom-in lengths I captured right here. But it definitely looks as if the iPhone SE is way much less zoom succesful. Selfies work higher on iPhoneThe Pixel 3A and the iPhone SE are typically evenly matched with regards to their entrance cameras. Sometimes the Pixel captures extra element, different instances the iPhone captures richer shade. Can’t have all of it, eh? There is a distinction maker, although. Based on my testing, the iPhone SE is healthier at coping with a greater variety of lighting situations. In the under selfie, you may see my oddly-shaped head. Look nearer on the Pixel shot, although, and you may additionally word extra element within the background shrubbery. You’ll additionally see flat white remnants on the espresso cup lid, in addition to my dry lips and regrettably bushy knuckles. Hooray for extra element!In the under selfie, although, I most well-liked the iPhone SE’s colours, particularly within the background leaves. The Pixel additionally made my face look unusually easy, a reversal of its Portrait-mode impact.But once more, pretty evenly matched. Yet the Pixel, regardless of how onerous I attempted, couldn’t deal with the lighting out the entrance of my home. This is a portrait selfie, a functionality each telephones have, however the usual pictures have been the identical. Washed out, terrible colours and simply fully off. This does not all the time occur, however even in different pictures I observed that the Pixel was much less adept at dealing with vibrant lighting situations. So the nod goes to the iPhone right here.Comparing videoThe Pixel does an admirable job on video in comparison with the iPhone, as Apple’s units are famend for his or her video capabilities. But the iPhone stays forward right here. The key distinction was dynamic vary. This was notably evident at night time, the place automobile headlights would blare on the Pixel, and the iPhone was visibly capable of seize deeper blacks. Check out the video under to see some video footage in contrast. 

Now enjoying:
Watch this:

iPhone SE vs. Google Pixel 3A digicam shootout

5:55

So between its extra vivid captures, constant Portraits and selfies, I’d name the iPhone the winner right here — regardless that the Pixel does higher with zoom and Night Sight. But it is an edge Apple might not maintain onto for lengthy: The rumored Pixel 4A is not far-off.