Pixel 3A vs. iPhone SE.
Ian Knighton/CNET
The iPhone SE is Apple’s new entry-level cellphone. For $399 (£419, AU$749), you get a tool with the identical highly effective A13 processor because the $699 iPhone 11, packed into the physique of an iPhone 8. Equally spectacular, you get a digicam that is related in some ways to the 11, although with out a few bells and whistles. This is paying homage to Google’s Pixel 3A. Last yr, the 3A supplied the distinctive digicam in 2018’s Pixel 3 for simply $399. Which begs the query: Does Apple’s new entry-level digicam beat Google’s? In most circumstances, it certainly does.The two telephones have related digicam capabilities. Both are single-lens setups, uncommon in an age the place even price range telephones have two or three cameras on the again. As a consequence, each lack ultrawide angle capabilities or a shooter devoted to optimizing zoom. (To get an iPhone with a telephoto lens, you will must shell out for an 11 Pro.) Both can shoot 4K video, too. Where they diverge most is at night time time: The 3A provides Night Sight, whereas the SE has no possibility for bettering low-light circumstances. And certain sufficient, the Pixel 3A has a lot stronger night-time efficiency. Outside of that, although, the SE wins large. 
iPhone SE’s customary pictures guidelinesThe photographs taken by the Pixel 3A are, on the whole, extra subdued than these captured by the iPhone SE. There are execs and cons to this. The iPhone sometimes suffers from overpowering highlights, whereas the Pixel is extra constant. But in my testing it was often the iPhone that shot extra spectacular photographs. See how rather more vibrant this close-up shot of a flower is, as an illustration. It seems undersaturated and artificially cooled when captured by the Pixel 3A, and rather more vigorous by the iPhone SE. It’s not at all times as one-sided as this, although. The banksia flower under is rather more hanging as captured by the iPhone, as an illustration, however the Pixel has some benefits. The greens are deeper, and the Pixel did a greater job at utilizing gentle to separate fore- and background. For essentially the most half, although, that tendency for exuberance works within the iPhone’s favor. This espresso shot, barely embarrassing to soak up public, exemplifies one other dynamic: The Pixel tends to chill photographs down, whereas the iPhone warms them up. It’s honest to have a subjective choice on which tone you favor however, exterior of hue, the iPhone photograph definitely pops extra. Again, there are occasions when the Pixel’s extra restrained pictures works in its favor. This photograph of shrubbery (there’s not a lot to take photographs of apart from flowers and greenery proper now) has unwieldy lighting on the SE as in comparison with the extra balanced 3A, as an illustration. But that photograph is an outlier; of the handfuls of normal photographs I took with the 2 telephones, this shot under might be essentially the most consultant. Both telephones seize nice photographs, however the iPhone’s are extra dynamic and extra hanging.Pixel Portraits vs. iPhone SEBoth the iPhone SE and Pixel 3A take distinctive portrait photographs. Yet there are variations. And right here, extra so than customary photographs, which you want extra will largely come down to non-public choice quite than one digicam being higher than one other. A key distinction within the two is not about image high quality, however image taking. The Pixel 3A zooms in when it takes portraits — the shot under was taken from the very same distance. This is a sensible matter that makes the Pixel 3A barely much less versatile on the subject of framing than the SE. (iPhones often zoom in 2x as a default for Portrait mode, however the SE would not as a result of it has no telephoto lens.) You’ll discover within the above image that my housemate Dan’s hair, each the curls on prime and the beard under, are sharper and extra detailed within the Pixel’s seize. His pores and skin tone seems somewhat brushed within the iPhone shot, too. Also observe how in another way the 2 gadgets captured his jumper. The iPhone’s inexperienced is extra correct.In the under photographs of Rachael, the Pixel’s rendition is extra balanced. But it is also flatter. Note how extra distinctly foregrounded she is within the iPhone shot. There’s some lack of element, as Rach’s eyes pop within the iPhone shot however you’ll be able to barely see their shade within the Pixel photograph. Her pores and skin additionally seems extra pure within the iPhone portrait. The Pixel photograph seems like somebody took the Structure worth in an Instagram put up and pushed it up.iPhone SE (L) vs. Pixel 3a (R).
Daniel Van Boom/CNET
This is extra pronounced within the under portraits of Dynn. His pores and skin seems a tiny bit brushed within the iPhone shot, however approach too sharp and crisp within the Pixel 3A picture. The creases under his eyes appear to be notably unlucky outcomes of synthetic sharpening. Ultimately, which cellphone takes a greater portrait shot relies upon totally on subjective style. I might give factors to the iPhone for extra consistency, although.Night Sight is kingWhen it involves low-light pictures, it is fairly easy. If we’re evaluating standing night-time photographs, the iPhone is often barely higher. But the Pixel 3A has Night Sight, and the iPhone SE would not have the night time mode discovered on the 11 vary. If Night Sight is on, there is no competitors.Take the under scene. The Pixel 3A arguably took a cooler image — the sparse gentle produces an eerie impact — however the iPhone SE captured far more data. In the latter’s photograph you’ll be able to see extra of the mulch on the bottom, in addition to extra of the encompassing timber. These photos of gnocchi have been taken with some background lighting, not true night-time circumstances. The iPhone’s has a lot better distinction, and has a extra satisfying sharpness to it. The Pixel 3A, in the meantime, has one thing of an disagreeable tint on account of some white stability points. But then we get to the iPhone SE taking up the Pixel 3A with Night Sight turned on. It’s an entire new recreation, one which highlights how a lot of a blessing night time modes are. In all the under circumstances, you will see Night Sight outclasses the iPhone SE’s (admirable) low-light efficiency.Zoom is iPhone SE’s weak spotYou’ll have to offer me some leeway with this one, as evaluating the zoom capabilities of the 2 telephones was one thing of an inexact science. The iPhone SE’s photograph app offers you a zoom slider, however no corresponding quantity to let you know in case you’re 2x or 3x or 4x zoomed in. As a consequence, the under photographs will not be 1:1 comparisons, since they’re unlikely to be exactly the identical degree of zoom. With that stated, the Pixel 3a seems far forward of the iPhone SE. I imply this actually, because the 3a can go as much as 7x digital zoom and it looks as if the SE caps out at 5x. But the Pixel 3A additionally takes clearer zoomed-in photographs. In the above photograph, round 2x zoom, the Pixel’s shot is far clearer and sharper. You’ll see this in case you look intently on the greenery, however it hits you instantly as you look on the pink flowers.The under shot is round 4x zoom, of a bottle of wine I’ve been hiding from my housemates (drink responsibly, y’all). Admittedly, you’ll be able to see I’ve zoomed a bit additional on the iPhone SE — however that there is a large distinction in image high quality that is unlikely to be defined by the small hole in zoom. The iPhone retains its heat, however seems rather more noisy. This is very true if you have a look at the background.Finally, this water jug (beforehand stuffed with beer — drink responsibly and so forth.) was shot at 5x zoom on each telephones. The 3A’s shot is far clearer. I’m anxious to say something too decisive, since once more I can not be 100% certain in regards to the zoom-in lengths I captured right here. But it definitely looks as if the iPhone SE is much much less zoom succesful. Selfies work higher on iPhoneThe Pixel 3A and the iPhone SE are typically evenly matched on the subject of their entrance cameras. Sometimes the Pixel captures extra element, different occasions the iPhone captures richer shade. Can’t have all of it, eh? There is a distinction maker, although. Based on my testing, the iPhone SE is healthier at coping with a greater variety of lighting circumstances. In the under selfie, you will see my oddly-shaped head. Look nearer on the Pixel shot, although, and you will additionally observe extra element within the background shrubbery. You’ll additionally see flat white remnants on the espresso cup lid, in addition to my dry lips and regrettably furry knuckles. Hooray for extra element!In the under selfie, although, I most well-liked the iPhone SE’s colours, particularly within the background leaves. The Pixel additionally made my face look unusually clean, a reversal of its Portrait-mode impact.But once more, pretty evenly matched. Yet the Pixel, irrespective of how onerous I attempted, couldn’t deal with the lighting out the entrance of my home. This is a portrait selfie, a functionality each telephones have, however the usual photographs have been the identical. Washed out, terrible colours and simply utterly off. This would not at all times occur, however even in different photographs I seen that the Pixel was much less adept at dealing with shiny lighting circumstances. So the nod goes to the iPhone right here.Comparing videoThe Pixel does an admirable job on video in comparison with the iPhone, as Apple’s gadgets are famend for his or her video capabilities. But the iPhone stays forward right here. The key distinction was dynamic vary. This was notably evident at night time, the place automotive headlights would blare on the Pixel, and the iPhone was visibly capable of seize deeper blacks. Check out the video under to see some video footage in contrast. 

Now enjoying:
Watch this:

iPhone SE vs. Google Pixel 3A digicam shootout

5:55

So between its extra vivid captures, constant Portraits and selfies, I’d name the iPhone the winner right here — despite the fact that the Pixel does higher with zoom and Night Sight. But it is an edge Apple might not maintain onto for lengthy: The rumored Pixel 4A is not far-off.