For years, I’ve assumed that most individuals don’t want third-party antivirus instruments and have cheerily handed this suggestion alongside to others.
After all, Microsoft’s Windows Security suite (also referred to as Windows Defender or Microsoft Defender) gives built-in virus safety on your PC, and it doesn’t value a dime. I’ve been utilizing it for years, and the final time I can recall having virus issues on my PC was nicely over a decade in the past.
And but, trying round for affirmation of this long-held perception shortly turns up an alternate universe, stuffed with consultants who insist that everybody ought to be paying for antivirus software program. This recommendation comes not simply from the businesses that promote antivirus suites, however from respected websites that carry out antivirus software program evaluations (PCWorld included).
On high of that, almost every laptop I’ve reviewed for PCWorld has include some type of antivirus trialware from firms like McAfee and Norton. Those firms pay PC makers for placement, which wouldn’t make sense if nobody purchased the merchandise, proper?
At this level, I’ve heard sufficient questions from readers—and relations—that I made a decision to dig just a little deeper. What I’ve realized is that my preliminary assumptions have been principally right: Most individuals can certainly skate by with out further antivirus software program. But that doesn’t imply everybody ought to, or that you just shouldn’t take any further precautions to remain secure.
As an preliminary sanity verify on my antivirus assumptions, I did the obvious factor potential and put out the question on Twitter: Does Microsoft’s built-in Windows Security software present sufficient safety for typical PC customers?
The consensus reply was sure, with caveats.
Justin Duino of How-To Geek pointed to his website’s helpful article on the subject, which really useful Windows Security along side Malwarebytes’ free malware scanner. My fellow freelance journalist Rob Pegoraro additionally called out a Wirecutter article that came to the same conclusion. Another author chimed in with a similar recommendation.
The reasoning is straightforward: Windows Security rivals different packages at sniffing out viruses. While this wasn’t all the time the case, Microsoft’s detection has improved significantly lately, to the purpose that the unbiased AV-TEST Institute repeatedly awards it an ideal 6 out 6 in safety, usability, and efficiency, beating industry averages.
Perhaps extra importantly, safety is decentralized now, so a single virus scanner is now not your solely line of safety. Some examples:
- Major internet browsers can detect and block malicious web sites on their very own, due to instruments like Google Safe Browsing.
- Those browsers may warn you if you happen to’re about to obtain an unrecognized program.
- Major electronic mail suppliers, reminiscent of Gmail and Yahoo, scan attachments for viruses earlier than you may even obtain them.
- Those similar electronic mail suppliers’ spam filters do an incredible job at conserving malicious emails out of your inbox and warning you of potential phishing schemes.
- The SmartScreen filter constructed into Windows will warn you if you happen to’re trying to put in unrecognized software program.
Antivirus, in the long run, is simply one other line of protection. For most individuals, Microsoft’s built-in defenses ought to be robust sufficient.
Getting a second opinion
Jared Newman / Foundry
So why to do some people advocate Malwarebytes as a further layer of safety? Mainly as a result of it’s good to have one other set of eyes in your pc.
Last 12 months, as an example, I ran a scan in Malwarebytes, and picked up a set of probably undesirable packages tied to my set up of Chrome. While my Chrome set up gave the impression to be working tremendous—with no sketchy toolbars or search redirects that I might see—this did persuade me to delete my sync data from Chrome, reset its settings, and carry out a contemporary Chrome set up. (I believe it was a browser extension behaving badly.)
But Malwarebytes has its downsides as nicely. If you’re not cautious throughout set up, it should routinely set up its personal extension in all of your browsers, and the free model routinely nags you with improve prompts. Also, except you disable its real-time protections (that are solely obtainable as a 14-day trial totally free customers), they’ll override Microsoft’s personal virus scanner.
I should still often set up Malwarebytes to get a second opinion on my pc’s well being, however for now, I’m leaving it off my PC as nicely.

Tools like Norton 360 present extra than simply virus scanning.
Ian Paul / Foundry
To be clear, third-party antivirus software program isn’t a grift with no precise utility behind it. While most individuals don’t must pay for antivirus software program, there are nonetheless some causes to contemplate doing so:
- You want extra assist with safety: Some antivirus packages provide further security measures past the realm of conventional virus scanning. Avast, as an example, can monitor webcam use and allow you to block untrusted apps from capturing video, and it may well additionally warn you if any of your on-line passwords are concerned in a safety breach.
- You’re seeking to bundle: In addition to further security measures, some antivirus packages provide instruments that you just may in any other case buy individually. Norton 360 Deluxe, as an example, contains its personal password supervisor and cloud storage service. Avast One has a built-in VPN and a brief file cleaner.
- You need extra sorts of safety: Some third-party instruments provide extra strategies of safety that aren’t constructed into Windows. AVG’s “Behavior Shield,” as an example, can search for patterns of malicious conduct even when it hasn’t detected a virus, whereas Avast One has ransomware safety that forestalls apps from encrypting your recordsdata with out permission. (Windows gives this as nicely, however not by default.) Antivirus suites additionally usually present safety for cell units in addition to private computer systems.
All of those further options, nonetheless, can bloat up your pc, affecting efficiency and getting in your manner, and they may not even be the very best instruments for the job. I’d a lot relatively use a dedicated password manager than one which’s bundled with antivirus software program, and if I wanted a VPN, I’d need to choose the provider myself.
While further antivirus software program was important within the early days of private computing, today it’s only one potential software within the broader safety arsenal, which also needs to embrace robust passwords, two-factor authentication, robust data backups, and a wholesome dose of frequent sense. On that, not less than, the consultants appear to be in complete concord.
Want extra tech recommendation like this? Sign up for my Advisorator newsletter, the place a model of this column initially appeared.