Nvidia and AMD make the perfect graphics playing cards you should purchase, however selecting between them isn’t straightforward. Unlike earlier generations, AMD and Nvidia commerce blows point-for-point in 2024, and selecting a model to go together with isn’t as straightforward as counting the {dollars} in your pockets.
I’ve reviewed each graphics card AMD and Nvidia have launched this technology, evaluating not solely uncooked efficiency, but in addition options like DLSS and FSR, ray tracing efficiency, and the way VRAM works in fashionable video games. After dozens of graphics card evaluations, right here’s how AMD and Nvidia stack up towards one another in 2024.
Nvidia vs. AMD in 2024
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
Before moving into the main points, let’s set the stage for Nvidia and AMD in 2024. Both have mature generations of graphics playing cards, and I don’t anticipate we’ll see any extra entries. We’re trying ahead to the tip of this yr and early subsequent yr for Nvidia and AMD to launch their subsequent technology of graphics playing cards.
Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Nvidia has its Ada Lovelace GPUs, extra generally known as RTX 40-series graphics playing cards. There are 10 playing cards in complete, although solely eight are technically a part of Nvidia’s lineup. It sounds complicated, however the listing under ought to clear issues up.
The two lacking GPUs are the RTX 4070 Ti and RTX 4080, each of which have been changed by a Super refresh. The RTX 4070, the one different GPU with a Super refresh, nonetheless lives alongside the refreshed mannequin. Although the RTX 4080 and RTX 4070 Ti are technically discontinued, you may nonetheless discover some fashions in inventory on the time of writing.
Outside of the Super shifting, the one different oddity in Nvidia’s lineup is the RTX 4060 Ti. Nvidia sells two variations of this GPU, one with 8GB and the opposite with 16GB. They’re the very same graphics card, simply with a distinction in reminiscence capability.
AMD has a smaller lineup at seven GPUs, and there aren’t any Super refreshes to deal with. Here’s how AMD’s RDNA 3 vary appears to be like at a look:
In each instances, we ordered the graphics playing cards from most to least highly effective — the RTX 4070 Ti is extra highly effective than the RTX 4070, for instance. This may also help you get your bearings when Nvidia or AMD’s lineup, however the comparability between the 2 manufacturers is a bit of murky.
Below, you may see a desk displaying how the choices from AMD and Nvidia evaluate roughly. We’ll get into efficiency and pricing later, however this reveals the tough equivalents from each manufacturers.
Nvidia
AMD
RTX 4090
—
RTX 4080 Super/RTX 4080
RX 7900 XTX
RTX 4070 Ti Super
RX 7900 XT
RTX 4070 Ti
—
RTX 4070 Super
RX 7900 GRE
RTX 4070
RX 7800 XT
—
RX 7700 XT
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB/8GB
—
—
RX 7600 XT
RTX 4060
RX 7600
There are a few odd gaps within the lineup, so that you gained’t all the time have an alternative choice to one GPU in the event you’re locked on a selected model. Again, we ordered the playing cards right here by general energy, and the gaps characterize that. For occasion, the RTX 4060 Ti is extra highly effective than the RX 7600 XT, and the RX 7700 XT is extra highly effective than that.
Pricing and availability
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
There isn’t a lot sense in evaluating the listing costs of AMD and Nvidia’s present GPUs. Prices have shifted because the technology has gone on, placing some GPUs in additional direct competitors with one another. Here’s a breakdown of what you may anticipate to spend on a current-gen GPU on the time of publishing:
RTX 4090 —
RTX 4080 Super —
RX 7900 XTX —
RTX 4070 Ti Super —
RX 7900 XT —
RTX 4070 Super —
RX 7900 GRE —
RTX 4070 —
RX 7800 XT —
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB —
RX 7700 XT —
RTX 4060 Ti 8GB —
RX 7600 XT —
RTX 4060 —
RX 7600 —
There are a few general developments. If you evaluate this listing of costs with the stack of GPUs above, you’ll see that AMD GPUs are usually cheaper. Not solely is the RX 7600 the most affordable GPU out there out of the current-gen lineups, however playing cards just like the RX 7800 XT are available in barely cheaper than the direct competitors within the type of the RTX 4070.
All however one among these GPUs are available at on-line retailers, both for listing value or under listing value. The RTX 4090 is the exception. The AI growth prompted it to fly off the cabinets, and even at this time, it’s laborious to seek out one out there for below $2,000. It’s not a good time to purchase the RTX 4090, and it’d by no means be.
Even with out the RTX 4090 fiasco, AMD is clearly forward on pricing. There’s quite a lot of segmentation in Nvidia’s lineup, notably between $400 and $600. AMD has a way more concise lineup round this value, with clear steps in efficiency between every entry. At the high-end, Nvidia GPUs are nonetheless sitting at listing value, largely propped up by the Super refresh, whereas AMD’s choices have slowly fallen in value.
Winner: AMD
Performance
I’ve evaluations of all of Nvidia and AMD’s current-gen GPUs linked above. If you’re eager about a selected card, be certain that to learn our evaluations for a full breakdown of benchmarks. Here, we’re going to hit some common notes of comparability for the three main resolutions, accounting for our full take a look at suite.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
Starting with 4K, Nvidia clearly wins the upper finish of efficiency. The RTX 4090 is manner too highly effective of a GPU to deal with, putting Nvidia far within the lead. Down the stack, the RTX 4080 Super wins over AMD’s direct competitors, however under $1,000, AMD comes out forward. That’s showcased by the RX 7900 XT, which is forward of the RTX 4070 Ti Super regardless of being $100 cheaper.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
That story continues at 1440p, primarily on the again of the RX 7900 GRE. It beats the RTX 4070 Super whereas operating $50 cheaper, and it vastly outpaces the RTX 4070 on the identical value. Similarly, the RX 7800 XT comes out barely forward of the RTX 4070 regardless of being round $50 cheaper.
These exams embrace our full suite, which has a handful of ray-tracing titles, too. We’ll take a better take a look at ray tracing within the subsequent part, however that’s an space the place Nvidia usually holds a lead. Outside of ray tracing, the direct competitors from AMD usually holds up higher on the identical value.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
Things change at 1080p, which is shocking given the lukewarm reception of playing cards just like the RTX 4060 from Nvidia. The RX 7700 XT is a good choice in comparison with the RTX 4060 Ti, however down decrease, the RX 7600 and particularly the RX 7600 XT fail to impress. Nvidia presents a greater steadiness with the RTX 4060 and RTX 4060 Ti for 1080p avid gamers proper now.
If we take a look at general efficiency, AMD delivers extra efficiency in your greenback within the candy spot between higher-end 1080p gaming and lower-end 4K gaming. Nvidia delivers higher peak efficiency general and a greater worth decrease down the stack. However, there are numerous concerns exterior of efficiency.
In the subsequent two sections, we’ll focus on ray tracing and have assist, the place the scales tip again in Nvidia’s favor. For this part, AMD wins for higher general efficiency.
Winner: AMD
Ray tracing
Nvidia has been the chief in ray tracing because the introduction of RTX GPUs in 2018, however AMD is way nearer now than it was once. An enormous motive why is that we’re seeing extra video games with much less demanding ray tracing implementations, comparable to Resident Evil 4, the place AMD’s GPUs run a lot better than they did in years previous.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
You can see that in motion above. In much less demanding video games like Returnal and Resident Evil 4, the RX 7900 GRE beats the RTX 4070 with ray tracing turned on, even supposing the 2 GPUs are available in on the identical value.
There’s much more to this story, nonetheless, and Cyberpunk 2077 supplies a touch as to why. In probably the most demanding ray tracing video games, Nvidia leads. As you may see within the part above, the RX 7900 GRE is about 16% quicker than the RTX 4070 general, which is a median that features these ray tracing outcomes. Despite that large lead, Nvidia nonetheless comes out forward in Cyberpunk 2077.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
If you take a look at the comparability between the RTX 4070 Ti Super and RX 7900 XT, you may see how Nvidia nonetheless holds the lead in ray tracing. The playing cards commerce blows with the much less demanding titles, however Nvidia holds an enormous lead in Cyberpunk 2077.
AMD is aggressive in some ray tracing video games, however Nvidia nonetheless wins this part. You wish to see your ray tracing, and that usually comes at an enormous efficiency price. Titles like Cyberpunk 2077, Alan Wake 2, and Portal with RTX look unimaginable as a result of advanced, taxing lighting tech, and Nvidia can deal with the warmth of these demanding situations much better.
Winner: Nvidia
DLSS and FSR
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
There’s an enormous pattern towards options defining how good or dangerous a selected GPU is. We’ve seen AMD and Nvidia each closely put money into software program past the silicon over the previous few years. For AMD, it’s FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR), and for Nvidia, it’s Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS). And there are a ton of variations between them.
Starting with AMD, FSR compromises two elements. The first half is upscaling, which works with any GPU and presents a efficiency increase by rendering your sport at a decrease decision. A small set of video games additionally assist FSR 3, which provides body technology into the combo. This compares two frames and generates one in between to spice up your body charge.
The massive boon for FSR is that it’s model agnostic; it really works with Nvidia, AMD, and Intel GPUs. The disadvantage is that it doesn’t all the time look the perfect. You can see that in Horizon Forbidden West above. Compared to DLSS, FSR is way softer, notably with Aloy’s hair and the vegetation surrounding the character.
Another disadvantage, at the very least proper now, is FSR 3 body technology. It appears to be like nice, however solely a small variety of titles assist the characteristic. Games like Cyberpunk 2077, Warhammer 40Okay: Darktide, and Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart, which have promised body technology, have but to obtain an replace for FSR 3.
On Nvidia’s finish, you may have DLSS. It consists of three core elements: Super Resolution, which is upscaling; Ray Reconstruction, which improves the standard of ray-traced results; and Frame Generation, which compares two frames to generate one in between. The massive distinction between FSR and DLSS is that DLSS makes use of AI for all of its elements and requires an RTX GPU to run the AI mannequin on devoted accelerators.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends
You can see in Hogwarts Legacy how AI makes a distinction. On the shingles, DLSS is ready to keep far more element than FSR. In addition, DLSS is far more secure. Both FSR and DLSS are topic to ghosting and flickering artifacts, however DLSS usually handles high-quality particulars higher than FSR does.
DLSS Super Resolution and Ray Reconstruction work on all RTX GPUs, however Frame Generation solely works on new RTX 40-series GPUs. It appears to be like barely higher than FSR 3, however the two options are shut. The massive increase for Nvidia is that DLSS 3 is in a ton of video games, comparable to Alan Wake 2, Cyberpunk 2077, and Remnant 2.
Since the introduction of DLSS, Nvidia has been one step forward of AMD within the options division, and that is still true at this time. DLSS is without doubt one of the primary causes to purchase an Nvidia GPU, and it’s an enormous motive why video games like Alan Wake 2 and Cyberpunk 2077 are even doable with their demanding path-tracing modes.
Winner: Nvidia
Software and drivers
Nvidia
There isn’t a lot of a comparability between AMD and Nvidia in the case of driver assist. We’ve seen points with each in the case of driver releases prior to now, and each are fast to unravel these points after they come up. AMD and Nvidia additionally steadily launch drivers alongside new sport releases. Single out a single sport or single-driver launch, and also you’ll discover a winner. Overall, AMD and Nvidia are evenly matched in driver high quality and assist.
Software is a unique matter. Nvidia was once in a distant second place to AMD, however that each one modified with the Nvidia App. Now, you may have a unified app for Nvidia that encompasses not solely drivers, really useful settings, and gameplay recording, but in addition different apps like Nvidia Broadcast and ICAT.
You get your customary suite of options, together with a screenshot operate, recording by means of Nvidia Shadowplay, and prompt replay. Nvidia has just a few distinctive options by means of Freestyle, although. With an RTX GPU, you should use RTX Dynamic Vibrance and RTX HDR, each of which use AI to boost the look of your video games.
Unlike the earlier model of the Nvidia App — referred to as GeForce Experience — you don’t have to create an account with Nvidia to entry any of those options. That alone does a ton to steadiness the scales between Nvidia and AMD with software program.
AMD has Radeon Software, which comes with a equally sturdy listing of options. It has nearly too many to listing. Like GeForce Experience, you may entry prompt replay, screenshot and video seize, efficiency monitoring, and graphical settings for supported video games. You may stream with Radeon Software and apply an overclock to your GPU.
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Radeon Software has just a few further goodies, although. Integer Scaling, for instance, upscales retro video games to work on fashionable shows, and AMD Link permits you or your mates to hook up with your PC remotely on nearly any system. All of AMD’s gaming options — FreeSync, Radeon Chill, and Radeon Anti-Lag, to call just a few — are accessible by means of Radeon Software as effectively.
AMD had an enormous lead with Radeon Software in years previous, however the brand new Nvidia apps carry Team Green as much as par. Now, it’s laborious to go fallacious with both.
Winner: Tie
Mobile GPUs
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Along with desktop graphics playing cards, Nvidia and AMD have cell GPUs. But you’ll discover much more laptops with Nvidia graphics playing cards. Similar to Intel vs. AMD, Nvidia has a a lot bigger stake within the cell market, and also you’ll usually discover laptops with an Nvidia graphics card and Intel processor.
It’s troublesome to attract any agency conclusions about how AMD and Nvidia cell GPUs carry out in contrast to one another. For instance, the RX 6800M contained in the Asus ROG Strix G15 outperforms the RTX 3080 contained in the MSI GS66 Stealth. The MSI laptop computer doesn’t characteristic a totally powered RTX 3080, although, and it doesn’t have as sturdy a cooling answer. So, is AMD higher for cell graphics playing cards? It’s a bit of extra sophisticated than uncooked efficiency.
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Mobile graphics playing cards don’t match their desktop counterparts, and laptop computer designers are free to decide on how a lot energy the playing cards get. The RTX 3080 contained in the MSI GS66 Stealth, for instance, tops out at 95W. The RTX 3080 contained in the Razer Blade 15 can draw as much as 105W of energy, and it unsurprisingly performs higher. Add on high of that totally different cooling options, and the comparability isn’t so simple.
When it involves cell GPUs, particular person laptop computer evaluations are a should. There are completely variations between graphics playing cards — the RX 6800M will carry out higher than the RX 6700M, and so forth. But in the case of two comparable graphics playing cards, the laptop computer design performs a way more vital position in efficiency than in the event you went with an AMD or Nvidia GPU.
Keep in thoughts DLSS and ray tracing, although. Nvidia cell GPUs nonetheless have entry to those options, and our conclusions on the desktop playing cards apply right here.
Winner: Nvidia
Performance parity, characteristic chief (Nvidia wins)
Image used with permission by copyright holder
AMD has tried to succeed in efficiency parity with Nvidia for years. And RX 7000 graphics playing cards hit that mark, typically even exceeding it. That places the concentrate on pricing and options. For pricing, AMD graphics playing cards are promoting for lower than their Nvidia counterparts. Factor in ray tracing and DLSS, although, and that further value is justified.
That doesn’t imply AMD is a foul choice. In 2024, AMD is a greater choice than it has been in years. That’s notably true in the event you’re seeking to get probably the most general efficiency in your greenback, and also you don’t care a lot about further options. Those options are an essential issue for lots of video games this yr, nonetheless, and due to that, Nvidia is our winner.
Editors’ Recommendations