At a look
Expert’s Rating
Pros
- Decent HMB PCIe 4.0 efficiency
- Sustains lengthy write efficiency higher than many of the finances competitors
- Extremely beneficiant TBW scores
Cons
- Slower total than a lot of the HMB PCIe 4.0 competitors
- Pricier than the efficiency at launch
Our Verdict
The Teamgroup C47 fell a bit shy of the competitors in artificial benchmarks, however was their equal in our real-world 48GB switch assessments and higher than most throughout giant sustained writes.
Price When Reviewed
This worth will present the geolocated pricing textual content for product undefined
Best Pricing Today
Price When Reviewed
1TB: $75 I 2TB: $120
Best Prices Today: Teamgroup C47 NVMe SSD
$74.99
$75.98
PCIe 4.0 HMB NVMe SSDs have flooded our take a look at portals just lately. And whereas I’d prefer to say unequivocally that the Teamgroup T-Create C47 is among the many better of them, it examined under par in artificial benchmarks and our 450GB write.
That mentioned, it does maintain lengthy writes exceptionally properly, and in addition completed second amongst PCIe 4.0 HMB drives in our 48GB switch assessments. At the suitable value (cheaper than it was on the time of this writing), it’s worthy of your quick listing.
Read on to be taught extra, then see our roundup of the best SSDs for comparability.
What are the Teamgroup T-Create C47’s options?
The T-Create C47 is a 2280 (22mm broad, 80mm lengthy) M.2, PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that employs a Maxio MAP1602A-F3C controller and 232-layer TLC NAND. It’s a bunch reminiscence buffer design that makes use of a portion of your PC’s reminiscence as main cache.
Secondary caching, as with all NVMe SSDs (DRAM or HMB), is completed by writing a sure portion of the NAND as SLC (Single-Layer/1-bit) then transferring it on the native bit-depth within the background as time permits.
Writing a single bit per cell obviates the necessity for in depth error checking to see if a multi-bit cell was written on the correct voltage. It’s the voltage stage in a multi-level cell that determines its numeric worth. SLC is both charged or not — i.e., on or off.
The T-Create C47 carries a variable, however nonetheless fairly beneficiant TBW (terabytes which may be written earlier than read-only mode) score of 500TBW for the 512GB mannequin, 1,000TBW for the 1TB capability, 1,500TBW for the 2TB model, and 3,000TBW for the 4TB capability. The norm for TLC is simply 600TBW per TB of capability. Teamgroup additionally warranties the drive for 5 years.
How a lot is the Teamgroup C47?
At the time of this writing the 1TB T-Create was $75 on Amazon, and the 2TB model I examined was $120. The 512MB and 4TB capacities had been unavailable on the time of this writing.
Compared to its friends, $75 is a bit excessive for a 1TB, however $120 is spot on for a 2TB PCIe 4.0 HMB SSD in the meanwhile — there’s not a stupendous variation in value between manufacturers at this time limit on this class.
How quick is the Teamgroup T-Create C47?
The C47 will get the job accomplished, simply maybe not as shortly as different PCIe 4.0 host reminiscence buffer SSDs. Overall, it’s high quality, even in the actual world, however there are a few eye-opening dips within the artificial outcomes.
The most puzzling outcome for the C47 was its 32-queue random write rating. HMB SSDs are usually nice at this. Both the competing WD SN5100 and the Lexar Play 2280 are PCIe 4.0 HMB designs, and had been significantly sooner on this take a look at. On the opposite hand, studying was round common. Go determine.
While it wasn’t aces in our artificial benchmark assessments, the C47 fared fairly properly in our real-world switch assessments. Note that FastCopy reveals the actual potential of the SSD. I nonetheless embody Windows Explorer outcomes as these are what customers will encounter most frequently, however I extremely suggest that you simply obtain that more-than-worthy utility for big file transfers. It’s free for personal use.
Again, the C47 was off the tempo writing our 450GB take a look at file. Not horribly, however noticeably so. But that information isn’t practically so unhealthy because it seems…
…as a result of, whereas the efficiency above may not point out such, the C47 is definitely top-of-the-line finances SSDs I’ve examined for writing giant quantities of contiguous knowledge. How so?
The 2TB drive I examined didn’t decelerate appreciably (2.45GBps to 195GBps) throughout a 950GB write — most drives on this class do.
In truth, it took an extra 450GB write earlier than the write price dropped to 500MBps to 800MBps at across the 160GB mark. It stayed there for the rest of the write. I’ve seen far worse native write charges (writing on the full bit-depth of the NAND) prior to now. This is on par with a SATA SSD the place as soon as TLC/QLC native writes had been slower than a tough drive. Ah, progress!
Okay, so the C47 didn’t take dwelling the blue ribbon in any take a look at besides a non-chart outcome. Not tanking utterly throughout lengthy writes carries loads of weight in our analysis. Where the C47 is gradual — with queued random reads and writes — doesn’t matter a lot as not loads of software program, together with Windows, doesn’t actually use queues. Sadly.
Should you purchase the Teamgroup T-Create C47?
While the C47 is among the slower PCIe 4.0 host reminiscence buffer drives in artificial benchmarks that I’ve examined, I used to be undoubtedly impressed by its sustained native write price.
Regardless, value is the prime determinator in late-model PCIe 4.0 HMB SSDs. If it’s cheaper than the competitors, go for it. You’ll by no means discover the distinction subjectively. If it’s not cheaper, go along with one thing else such because the WD Black SN7100/Blue 5100 or Lexar Play 2280.
Note: There’s no relation to the well-known C-47 cargo airplane that I’m conscious of, aside from hauling the freight.
How we take a look at
Drive assessments at present make the most of Windows 11 24H2, 64-bit operating off of a PCIe 4.0 Samsung 990 Pro in an Asus Z890-Creator WiFi (PCIe 4.0/5.0) motherboard. The CPU is a Core Ultra i5 225 feeding/fed by two Kingston Fury 32GB DDR5 4800MHz modules (64GB of reminiscence whole). Both 20Gbps USB and Thunderbolt 5 are built-in and Intel CPU/GPU graphics are used. PCIe 5.0 SSDs concerned in testing are mounted in a Asus ROG PCIe 5.0 M.2 adapter card and a HighPoint 7604A 16x PCIe 5.0 4-port M.2 adapter card.
We run the CrystalDiskMark 8 (and 9), AS SSD 2, and ATTO 4 artificial benchmarks (to maintain article size down, we solely report one) to seek out the storage machine’s potential efficiency, then a collection of 48GB and 450GB transfers assessments utilizing Windows Explorer drag and drop to indicate what you’ll see underneath Window, in addition to the far sooner Xcopy and FastCopy to indicate what’s doable.
A 25GBps two-SSD RAID 0 array on the aforementioned Highpoint 7604A is used because the second drive in our switch assessments. Formerly the 48GB assessments had been accomplished with a RAM disk.
Each take a look at is carried out on a NTFS-formatted and newly TRIM’d drive so the outcomes are optimum. Note that in regular use, as a drive fills up, efficiency might lower because of much less NAND for secondary caching, in addition to different elements. This subject has abated somewher with the present crop of SSDs with extra mature controllers and much sooner late-generation NAND.
Caveat: The efficiency numbers proven apply solely to the drive we had been shipped and to the capability examined. SSD efficiency can and can fluctuate by capability because of extra or fewer chips to shotgun reads/writes throughout and the quantity of NAND obtainable for secondary caching. Vendors additionally sometimes swap parts. If you ever discover a big discrepancy between the efficiency you expertise and that which we report, by all means, tell us.