Home Gaming The Last of Us Part I review: Making the past more accessible | Digital Trends

The Last of Us Part I review: Making the past more accessible | Digital Trends

0
The Last of Us Part I review: Making the past more accessible | Digital Trends

The Last of Us Part I
MSRP $70.00

“Though its visual upgrades feel superfluous, The Last of Us Part I makes key innovations in accessibility that’ll allow more players to enjoy an enduring classic.”

Pros

Story remains to be highly effective

Left Behind has aged splendidly

Some notable tech boosts

Bonus modes add replay worth

Landmark accessibility

Cons

Hardly a remake

Pricey for what’s supplied

After taking a couple of years off from gaming, I purchased a PS4 in 2014. It got here bundled with a free copy of The Last of Us Remastered, a recreation I didn’t know a lot about outdoors of its sterling popularity amongst critics. Less than per week later, I discovered myself watching my TV, my mouth hanging open as I processed the sport’s beautiful closing hour. “So, this is what video games can do,” I assumed to myself. My beforehand slim view of the medium as escapist leisure was smashed large open like a golf membership to a cranium.
Quite a bit has modified about video video games between then and the discharge of The Last of Us Part I, Sony’s new PS5 remake of a PS3 basic that obtained a PS4 improve. While it was a revelation even nonetheless in 2014, builders have since taken its coveted blood and injected it into every part from God of War to Tomb Raider. Returning to the PS5 glow-up eight years after I first performed the remaster feels a bit like going again to 1985’s Super Mario Bros. While many video games I play at this time have its DNA, it’ll all the time be affected person zero.
The Last of Us Part I exhibits that Naughty Dog’s gritty motion recreation remains to be an everlasting basic that hasn’t aged a day. Though that’s largely as a result of Sony received’t enable it to, as evidenced by a largely superfluous remake that doesn’t meaningfully enhance on the sport’s completely fashionable (and less expensive) 2014 remaster. However, the venture does as soon as once more push the trade ahead in an vital approach: by elevating the bar for accessibility in gaming’s previous, current, and future.
Still the most effective
The Last of Us Part I is a tough recreation to critique for quite a lot of causes that’ll change into clear shortly. No matter what number of philosophical gripes I’ve with the whole thought of the remake’s existence, it’s nonetheless the most effective model of what I’d take into account the best online game of the 2010s. Purely specializing in the textual content, it stays an outstanding expertise that few video games have totally replicated — together with its personal sequel.
The recreation tells the story of Joel, a father surviving alone throughout a zombie-like apocalypse after his daughter is killed. Long after that tragedy, Joel takes on a job to move a chunk of valuable cargo throughout the nation. That cargo is Ellie, a younger woman who’s seemingly proof against the illness that turns people into fungus-infested “clickers.” Perverting the fatherly excellent of the “protector,” Joel begins to deal with Ellie like an unwitting surrogate daughter on his journey to ship her to a gaggle referred to as the Fireflies.
The targeted nature of The Last of Us remains to be the sport’s greatest trait.

The brilliance of The Last of Us has all the time been in the best way it preys on the participant’s notion of online game protagonists. We assume Joel is a hero, as a result of video games largely place us within the recreation of the righteous good man. The Last of Us pushes gamers to reexamine that concept, utilizing the idea of the unreliable narrator to flip our once-accepted truths about online game language on their head. It’s an concept that solely works in addition to it does due to its interactive nature that places the participant answerable for Joel’s actions – one thing the sequence’ upcoming TV adaptation should work round.
The enduring energy of its devastating story is contingent on the second when gamers look down and see the blood on their very own arms. It lures gamers in with sickly satisfying stealth kills and gun fight (full with gory violence that’s all of the extra superb with enhanced visuals and a crisp 60 frames per second) earlier than main them to a horrific finale that re-contextualizes the whole recreation. Some discover it to be an affordable trick. Others proceed to overlook the purpose solely by rallying behind Joel as a lovable hero. Regardless of the place you fall, it’s nonetheless the uncommon big-budget online game that’s cognizant of how play itself can ship the message.

It’s particularly illuminating returning to the sport after 2020’s The Last of Us Part II, a recreation this re-release is clearly capitalizing on. The sequel is bloated in comparison with its predecessor’s smooth story. It tries to ask messy questions in regards to the cyclical nature of violence, however can’t assist however embody a New Game+ mode the place you get to maintain all of your cool weapons in one other playthrough. The targeted nature of The Last of Us remains to be the sport’s greatest trait, with impactful story beats interwoven with shining moments of tense stealth, zombie horror, and cinematic motion.
In reality, the most important revelation within the new package deal is simply how incredible the sport’s Left Behind DLC nonetheless is, which additionally will get a makeover right here. The two-hour story about Ellie scavenging for medication in an deserted mall stands up as one in all Naughty Dog’s most interesting video games in its personal proper. The bonus episode balances the tender and the tragic moments of human life, all whereas hitting the most effective mechanical beats of the principle recreation in a extra concise package deal that’s memorable from finish to finish.
If you’ve by no means performed any model of The Last of Us, Part I preserves its energy whereas including a recent sheen. If you could have performed it earlier than, that’s a wholly completely different dialog.
Pretty for a value
It’s exhausting to not really feel cynical in regards to the venture when shifting past the confines of the textual content itself. Positioned as a ground-up remake and priced at $70 like a brand new PS5 launch, The Last of Us Part I struggles to justify its personal existence in lots of respects. It feels disingenuous to name it a remake contemplating how few of its enhancements make a significant distinction over its 2014 remaster. It’s like watching a 4K restoration of a movie: It received’t change something about your relationship to the work, simply clear off your window to it.
The Last of Us was by no means good due to particle results.

The Last of Us Part I is undoubtedly a better-looking recreation than the 2014 model. Fire ferociously billows by means of the streets in its harrowing opening sequence. Landscapes emphasize the sweetness nonetheless current within the recreation’s hellish world with awe-inspiring graphical constancy. Faces are extra expressive, bringing further energy to moments like Ellie’s gut-wrenching closing confrontation with Joel. And every part occurs in a a lot cleaner 60 frames per second, making the motion really feel sooner and extra fluid than ever.
So why did nothing about my expertise change?
After enjoying the remake’s iconic intro, I instantly fired up the remaster, streaming it off of PS Plus through the cloud. For my first jiffy, the distinction felt vital. Everything was a bit extra unnatural in the course of the recreation’s opening cutscene, from the extra digital faces to the uneven framerate. And then I gained management. Within no time, my thoughts tailored to the visuals and I ended feeling the body dip solely. My mind crammed within the gaps and my response to the scene that unfolded was similar, extra billowy flames be damned.

I spoke with my co-worker Tomas Franzese about my expertise, questioning why I wasn’t wowed by options like the sport’s radically improved particle results. He replied, “The Last of Us was never good because of particle effects.”
He’s proper. The Last of Us Remastered doesn’t look photorealistic, however who cares? When I believe again to my expertise with it, its technical output isn’t what sticks with me. It’s the ambiance, the totally imagined dystopian world, the emotional relationship with how I’m enabling Joel’s misguided quest. I might need had opinions on its generally clueless A.I. on the time (which is drastically improved in Part I), however any critiques have lengthy since melted away. And after I discuss The Last of Us Part I in one other 10 years, I certain as hell received’t reward and even keep in mind the variety of particles on display screen.
The remake largely looks like a advertising and marketing alternative for Sony, capitalizing on the sport’s upcoming TV adaptation with an expensive improve. It does that with out making any significant modifications that alter my relationship to the work, one thing glorious remakes like Shadow of the Colossus or Demon’s Souls do. New options like companions having higher publicity consciousness will make for a fantastic Game Developers Conference discuss, however they received’t make somebody who’s performed the unique really feel like they’ve correctly spent their cash.

I don’t imply to undermine the passionate work that’s gone into rebuilding The Last of Us Part I. Naughty Dog has reworked a two-generations previous recreation into a contemporary marvel. It has even included nifty new options, like permadeath and speedrun modes, that’ll give previous followers a brand new cause to play. But the most effective remakes protect the sensation of enjoying a recreation when it first launched, making it look as spectacular because it did on the time. The Last of Us Part I does really feel the identical as I keep in mind it in 2014. But that’s as a result of it’s.
Accessibility in hindsight
There is one factor that’s modified for me between enjoying the remaster and remake: I’ve since change into extraordinarily nearsighted. When I performed the sport in 2014, I sat ten ft away from a 42-inch 1080p Vizio display screen crookedly mounted on my wall and will see each element. I performed The Last of Us Part I on a 55-inch 4K TCL show from 5 ft away and wanted to lean ahead if I needed to get a transparent take a look at it.
The remake goes to permit individuals who had been bodily unable to play the sport an opportunity to expertise it for the primary time.

That’s the place the remake’s precise enchancment comes into play. The Last of Us Part I consists of a big suite of accessibility choices that enable followers to tailor the expertise to their wants. Some of these choices are easy, like growing caption sizes. Others are groundbreaking, like the power to allow spoken audio descriptions for cutscenes. The remake goes to permit individuals who had been bodily unable to play the sport an opportunity to expertise it for the primary time. Frankly, that’s extra vital than any facial hair texture.
I can’t start to guess how successfully the sport will cater to each participant, however I can inform you about my very own expertise. Before beginning the sport, I went into the menus and started selecting choices like I used to be ordering sushi from a menu. I knew my hurdles could be visible, so I bumped up the dimensions of the HUD parts to start out — a seemingly basic possibility that some video games nonetheless lack. But what actually obtained me excited was the lengthy listing of audio cues I might allow. For occasion, lootable gadgets are normally marked with a small white triangle button immediate. Rather than straining to see it, I might toggle on an audio cue that might ding like a Wheel of Fortune board after I was near one thing I might seize.

I might make another cues tactile because of the DualSense controller. Usually aiming could be difficult in a recreation like this, as I can generally have bother clearly specializing in a faraway goal. Here, I used to be capable of allow a delicate vibration any time my crosshairs had been lined up with an enemy, letting me know I used to be the place I needed to be. The improvements go even deeper. One unbelievable possibility interprets all dialogue to haptic vibrations, permitting gamers to really feel how strains are being delivered. My eyesight situation is minor (and I can simply toss on a pair of glasses to resolve it, not like some visually impaired gamers), however with simply over half a dozen choices, I might simply play The Last of Us Part I simply in addition to I performed The Last of Us Remastered.
Accessibility isn’t solely about settings in a menu. It must be baked into the sport’s recreation design from the start, and naturally that’s not going to occur with a 1:1 remake of a 10-year-old recreation. There are some misfires right here, like treating recreation pace discount (a key accessibility software) as a bonus unlockable. And frankly, it’s a bit gross to assume that gamers who want the sport’s upgrades should pay $70 to get them whereas others can expertise the comparable remaster for $20. But what Naughty Dog has completed right here is admirable, taking a canonical basic that’s quintessential to gaming historical past and making an attempt to make it a extra inclusive expertise. If it’s going to be a recreation that’s mentioned for many years to return, extra individuals want to have the ability to get into the dialog.
My critiques of The Last of Us Part I are largely philosophical, however these really feel small when stacked up towards the actually vital work that’s been completed right here. If you’ve already performed The Last of Us and really feel outraged over what the remake gives, take into account that it doesn’t should be for you.
The Last of Us Part I used to be examined on a PS5 hooked as much as a TCL 6-Series R635 TV.

Editors’ Recommendations