Sarah Tew/CNET
Black Friday TV gross sales are going robust, and whereas most main TV makers are dispensing respectable reductions on their finest TVs — assume LG’s B9 OLED and Samsung QLEDs — Vizio is digging deeper with its flagship PX collection, reviewed right here. Normally $1,400 for the 65-inch measurement and $2,000 for the 75-inch model, this TV will promote for $400 much less at Costco: $1,000 (from Thanksgiving via Cyber Monday) for the 65-incher and $1,600 (now via Cyber Monday) for the 75. At that value, it is an unbelievable worth and one of the best general high-performance TV — if you cannot afford an OLED.

LikeThe Vizio P-Series Quantum X’s has one of the best general image of any TV at or under its pricePowerful brightness works effectively in vivid rooms and with HDR sourcesSignificantly cheaper than OLED TVs, significantly within the 75-inch measurement

Don’t LikeSome banding artifacts in HDR, lighter black ranges in some scenesLackluster distant and sensible TV

Yes, OLED TVs present superior picture high quality however they nonetheless price tons of or, within the case of the 75-inch measurement, 1000’s of {dollars} greater than this PX. Meanwhile, inexpensive fashions just like the TCL 6-Series and Vizio’s personal M-Series have picture high quality that is glorious as effectively, however in my side-by-side comparisons, the PX’s great gentle output and glorious distinction took it a step past. I additionally in contrast Vizio’s finest TV in opposition to the TCL 8-Series and Samsung Q80R, each of which price greater than the PX, and it cut up the distinction. The TCL (full overview coming quickly) was higher however nonetheless not in the identical league as LG’s B9 OLED, and whereas the Samsung was a lot vivid, its distinction and black ranges fell quick.Bottom line? If you need a premium-performing TV, save up for an OLED. But in the event that they’re simply too costly, the Vizio P-Series Quantum X makes an outstanding comfort prize, particularly should you get it at Costco within the subsequent few days.

Design and options: Not Vizio’s strongest fitsThe PX TV itself is not ugly by any means. It seems rather a lot like different TVs available on the market: swaths of shiny black and a minimalist body across the image, though Vizio makes use of flashy chrome legs and facet accents to determine its higher-end chops. Sure, high-end fashions from Samsung, LG and even TCL have extra distinctive seems, however there’s solely a lot any large, black-ish rectangle can do to differentiate itself. It’s in different features of design the place the PX fails. Vizio’s distant has been unchanged for years and stays my least favourite. It will get the job accomplished, however in comparison with the simplicity of Roku and Samsung remotes, or the developed wands of LG and Sony, it is an also-ran.
Sarah Tew/CNET
The identical goes for Vizio’s “Smartcast” sensible TV system. It’s worse than on some other present TV, with onscreen menus stuffed with a random choice of TV exhibits and films I did not care about and a sparse choice of apps (Disney Plus remains to be MIA, for instance). To watch any of the tons of of apps not a part of Vizio’s onscreen system, together with Disney Plus, you will use the solid operate in your telephone to connect with the TV. The Vizio’s Chromecast built-in characteristic is neat for phone-centric customers, however much less handy for individuals used to onscreen apps.

In Vizio’s favor the most recent model, 3.5, is far quicker than earlier than. In my exams evaluating the PX to a TCL 6-Series with Roku, the house web page got here up rapidly and apps, together with Netflix, YouTube and YouTube TV, relaunched in a snap (as soon as they loaded initially) — YouTube particularly was quicker on Vizio than on the TCL. Initial load occasions assorted between the 2 and scrolling inside apps was additionally comparable. 
Sarah Tew/CNET
The capacity to make use of your iPhone or iPad with Apple AirPlay on Vizio TVs is a welcome perk, and in my testing it labored effectively. Roku TVs lack AirPlay and Google Cast, however they do get Apple’s TV app (which can also be coming “in the future” to Vizio TVs). Unlike Roku, Samsung and LG, Vizio does not have any voice functionality constructed into its distant, however the TV will work with Amazon Alexa and Google Home audio system.Key TV options

Display expertise

LED LCD

LED backlight

Full array with native dimming

Resolution

4K

HDR appropriate

HDR10 and Dolby Vision

Smart TV

Smartcast 3.5

Remote

Standard

The greatest picture high quality additional is extra zones of full-array native dimming, my favourite augmentation to LCD image high quality as a result of it improves all-important distinction. The variety of dimmable zones is a crucial specification as a result of it controls how exact the dimming could be. More zones does not essentially imply higher image high quality, however it normally helps. The PX has 384 zones within the 65-inch and 480 within the 75-inch, greater than any TV except for the TCL 8-Series that divulges this quantity. (Samsung and Sony do not reveal their FALD zone numbers, however they’re probably increased on their finest TVs, just like the Q90R and 8K fashions.) Quantum dots, in the meantime, enable the PX-Series to realize higher HDR coloration. The TV delivered a comparable coloration gamut to different high-end fashions in my measurements.

Now taking part in:
Watch this:

Vizio debuts TVs with native dimming, quantum dots, AirPlay…

3:12

The PX-Series has a true 120Hz refresh price panel, identical to one of the best TVs from Sony, Samsung and TCL, they usually’re higher than the 60Hz panels discovered on cheaper units. Although you need to ignore Vizio’s “240Hz effective” and “Clear Action 960” claims, Vizio’s 120Hz panel does enhance video processing and likewise permits the choice to interact MEMC (movement estimation, movement compensation) — also referred to as the cleaning soap opera impact. You can even elect to interact black body insertion. Vizio helps each main sorts of HDR, HDR10 and Dolby Vision, within the PX-Series. So does each different main TV maker besides Samsung, which lacks Dolby Vision help.
Sarah Tew/CNET
Four HDMI inputs (model 2.0, with HDCP 2.2)One HDMI enter (model 1.4, 1080p/120Hz enter succesful)One component-composite video enterOne USB portRF antenna tuner inputEthernet portOptical digital audio outputStereo analog audio outputVizio is the one main TV maker with 5 HDMI ins. Four can settle for all main 4K and HDR sources. A fifth HDMI enter can settle for neither HDR nor 4K sources. Instead, Input 5 can deal with 1080p at 120Hz enter, excellent for so-equipped gaming PCs (we did not take a look at this operate). Gamers may also recognize that Input 5 has decrease enter lag than the others.Unlike most different 2019 TV makers Vizio is not supporting any HDMI 2.1 options like auto sport mode and variable refresh price, however most patrons will not miss them. Picture high quality comparisonsClick the picture above for image settings.
Sarah Tew/CNET
The PX scored a “9” in general picture high quality, increased than any LCD-based TV I’ve reviewed this 12 months however wanting the “10” I’ve given to OLED TVs. Its greatest energy is distinction, anchored by distinctive gentle output and excellent native dimming efficiency for an impactful picture with HDR photographs and in vivid rooms — each of which outperformed TVs that earned an “8” on this class, such because the TCL 6-Series and Vizio M-Series. Video processing was additionally superior to these fashions.The PX’s distinction with darkish scenes in SDR wasn’t nearly as good as these different TVs, nonetheless, and display uniformity was additionally a bit worse.Click the picture on the proper to see the image settings used within the overview and to learn extra about how this TV’s image controls labored throughout calibration.

Dim lighting: With non-HDR materials in a darkish room, its black ranges have been surprisingly a step behind any of the others in my comparability, leading to a barely extra washed-out picture. In the opening sequence of Shazam, for instance, the letterbox bars, the darkish inside of the automotive and the darkened seats appeared a bit too vivid as compared, robbing the picture of some distinction. In the extra combined scenes a bit later, for instance as the child explores the cave and speaks to the wizard, the variations evened out a bit however the PX nonetheless lagged barely behind in my side-by-side comparisons, even in opposition to the less-expensive Vizio PG and TCL 6-Series.It appeared as if Vizio’s native dimming was erring an excessive amount of towards exposing shadow element (which was glorious) on the expense of distinction — it was incapable of going as low in black areas as the opposite FALD TVs. The Samsung Q80R was simply the other, crushing shadows to get darker black ranges and letterbox bars. The TCL 8-Series struck a steadiness that appeared finest to my eye among the many LCDs, with deep black ranges and stable shadow element that got here closest — albeit wasn’t fairly nearly as good as — the B9 OLED.Bright lighting: The PX is Xtremely vivid: the brightest TV I measured this 12 months and the second-brightest ever, after the 2018 Samsung Q9. As you may see from the desk under, it belted out extra gentle than the three more-expensive TVs in my comparability.Light output in nits

TV

Brightest (SDR)

Accurate coloration (SDR)

Brightest (HDR)

Accurate coloration (HDR)

Vizio PX65-G1

1,990

1,120

2,908

2,106

TCL 65Q825

1,653

904

1,758

937

Samsung QN65Q80R

1,443

832

1,494

1,143

Sony XBR-65X950G

1,050

427

1,264

1,035

Vizio P659-G1

792

561

822

602

TCL 65R625

653

578

881

813

LG OLED65B9

374

283

628

558

As ordinary the Vivid mode was the brightest however horribly inaccurate. I prize the “Accurate” settings most, and Vizio’s is the simplest to implement: simply choose the Calibrated mode. Despite its jaw-dropping measurements with take a look at patterns, with actual HDR materials the PX truly appeared (and measured) dimmer than each the Samsung Q80R and the TCL 8-Series. See under for particulars, however it as soon as once more proves that take a look at sample measurements (and specs claims) aren’t the end-all, be-all.Under vivid lighting in broad daylight the PX’s display was excellent: a bit more-effective at mitigating reflections than the TCL 8-Series and the LG B9 and a bit worse than both one at preserving black ranges and distinction — results that tended to cancel one another out. None of the opposite TVs in my lineup might maintain a candle to the excellent Samsung, which has the best antireflective display I’ve ever seen and was one of the best bright-room TV in my lineup.Color accuracy: The Vizio’s coloration measured fairly effectively though in comparison with the opposite overview samples I acquired, it was considerably blue earlier than calibration. After calibration it was almost excellent, as have been the others, and evaluating colourful scenes from Shazam, just like the Philadelphia cityscape, the pink of the subway seats and younger Shazam’s pores and skin tones, variations have been negligible.
Video processing: The PX examined very effectively on this class. It achieved the utmost 1,200 strains of movement decision in my take a look at, and was ready to take action whereas sustaining appropriate 1080p/24 movie cadence. To get that outcome I set Reduce Judder to zero and Reduce Motion Blur to 10 whereas partaking Clear Action black body insertion. The latter setting cuts gentle output considerably, as ordinary, however not like on some TVs it does not trigger huge flicker (so long as Reduce Motion Blur is increased than zero). I nonetheless observed some flicker within the brightest photographs, nonetheless, so I stored it turned off for my exams. With Clear Action disabled, the PQ nonetheless managed an appropriate 600 strains of movement decision so long as Reduce Motion Blur was engaged.I’m no fan of the cleaning soap opera impact, however individuals who need a bit of smoothing may recognize that the PQ’s Reduce Judder slider is pleasantly gradual, with barely any smoothing on the 1 setting and barely extra at 2 and 3, earlier than entering into buttery territory at 4 and above.Unlike most TVs which have a single Game mode to cut back enter lag for gaming, the Vizio has a Game Low Latency (GLL) setting that may be utilized to any image mode — together with Game. The PX’s lag was excellent, if not fairly nearly as good as one of the best TVs, at about 26ms in Calibrated mode with GLL engaged for each 4K HDR and 1080p sources. Those numbers have been measured on Input 1, however the Input 5 was even higher, topping out at a really spectacular 14.83 ms (Calibrated, GLL on). As I discussed above, nonetheless, that enter is just for 1080p sources, however should you’re a twitch gamer going 1080p, Input 5 on the PX collection among the many lowest enter lags out there.Uniformity: With take a look at patterns the PX was stable with out an excessive amount of brightness variation throughout the display, though it wasn’t as uniform as the opposite units. With a midbright sample I noticed faint vertical bars that received extra noticeable in darkish grey areas. From off-angle the PX was worse than the TCL 8-Series and Samsung Q80, dropping distinction and coloration constancy quicker than each as I moved farther from the candy spot in entrance of the display, whereas after all the LG B9 OLED was mainly excellent.HDR and 4K video: With the best-quality video the Vizio got here into its personal, delivering an outstanding image general. I in contrast it extensively to the TCL 8-Series, the LG B9 OLED and the Samsung Q80R — all of which price considerably greater than the Vizio PX — utilizing the wonderful video montage from the Spears and Munsil 4K HDR benchmark disc. Between the 4 the Vizio got here in third-place general, higher than the Samsung however not so good as the TCL or LG, however visibly superior, due to brightness and punch, than the TCL 6-Series and Vizio P659-G1.I began with the 1,000 nits sequence as a result of it finest represents nearly all of HDR content material on the market. In essentially the most troublesome bright-on-dark scenes, for instance the honey dripper in opposition to the black background (2:47) and the Ferris wheel at night time (4:50), the LG B9 was one of the best of the 4, due to its excellent blacks and full lack of blooming and stray illumination. The TCL was second-best, with a really barely lighter black and little or no blooming. The Vizio received nearly as vivid because the TCL on this scene however had the worst blooming of the 4 and its highlights appeared considerably unnatural, as if processing have been bringing them up and enhancing element an excessive amount of. Meanwhile the Samsung was the worst, with a extra washed-out black than any of the others (together with the cheaper Vizio P-Series and TCL 6 collection) and fairly a little bit of blooming.The identical scenes at 4,000 nits, HDR content material out there on some fewer TV exhibits and films, was largely comparable in these scenes except for gentle output in highlights (see the desk under).Selected HDR highlights in nits

Spears & Munsil scene ingredient (timestamp)

Sequence (nits)

LG B9

Samsung Q80R

TCL 8-Series

Vizio PX

Sky above peaks (0:10)

1,000

200

370

345

208

Sky above peaks (0:10)

4,000

260

453

636

388

Between horse’s neck, forelock (0:37)

1,000

203

512

464

226

Between horse’s neck, forelock (0:37)

4,000

191

487

555

440

Reflection in honey dripper (2:47)

1000

384

506

438

360

Reflection in honey dripper (2:47)

4,000

386

604

735

704

Middle of Ferris wheel (4:50)

1,000

150

234

208

167

Middle of Ferris wheel (4:50)

4,000

233

207

190

232

In brighter scenes the sunshine output benefit of the LCDs over the OLEDs grew to become extra noticeable, though the Samsung and TCL each appeared (and measured) brighter than the Vizio. Watching some grazing horses in a snowfield (0:37), the TCL appeared one of the best, with excellent element and definition and superior brightness. The Vizio and B9 additionally appeared well-detailed however dimmer, whereas the Samsung was fairly vivid however obscured particulars essentially the most.In the identical scene at 4,000 nits the TCL and Vizio have been the one ones to protect the entire element within the grass; the LG and Samsung each confirmed much less definition, and the LG was markedly dimmer than any of the others.The Vizio’s greatest concern with HDR was coloration banding and visual gradation in some scenes, for instance the sky throughout a sundown (2:03), above a cityscape (4:39) and a satellite tv for pc dish (5:28). On one hand it wasn’t super-noticeable — higher than the P-Series Quantum final 12 months, for instance — however on the opposite it appeared worse on the Vizio PX (and the Vizio PG) than on the others. The TCL 8-Series additionally confirmed traces within the first two scenes albeit almost not as a lot because the PX, whereas the Samsung, LG and 6-Series have been basically completely clean as compared.Geek Box

Test

Result

Score

Black luminance (0%)

0.003

Good

Peak white luminance (SDR)

1,990

Good

Avg. gamma (10-100%)

2.18

Good

Avg. grayscale error (10-100%)

0.60

Good

Dark grey error (30%)

0.48

Good

Bright grey error (80%)

0.90

Good

Avg. coloration checker error

1.00

Good

Avg. saturation sweeps error

0.91

Good

Avg. coloration error

1.34

Good

Red error

1.30

Good

Green error

0.78

Good

Blue error

3.09

Average

Cyan error

0.92

Good

Magenta error

1.31

Good

Yellow error

0.64

Good

1080p/24 Cadence (IAL)

Pass

Good

Motion decision (max)

1,200

Good

Motion decision (dejudder off)

600

Average

Input lag (Game mode, Input 5)

14.83

Good

Input lag (Game mode, Input 1)

25.90

Good

HDR10

Black luminance (0%)

0.003

Good

Peak white luminance (10% win)

2,908

Good

Gamut % UHDA/P3 (CIE 1976)

97.74

Good

ColorMatch HDR error

1.80

Good

Avg. coloration checker error

4.64

Average

Input lag (Game mode, 4K HDR)

26.17

Good

Vizio PX65-G1 CNET overview calibration outcomes by David Katzmaier on Scribd