Netgear Nighthawk M5 mobile router review: Probably too expensive, but nice

Best Prices Today

As the sensible actuality of 5G begins to bear fruit, its many touted makes use of have gotten extra clear. One of these purposes is the creation of a robust, home-internet-style connection nearly wherever yow will discover an honest 5G sign. To that finish, Netgear has launched the Nighthawk M5 WiFi 6 cell router, which we evaluation right here. 

Pocket web 

The Nighthawk M5 is a diminutive AX1800 gadget, concerning the measurement of a small, sq., 250-page e-book, weighs about half a pound, and is aesthetically spartan. A 2.5-inch touchscreen on the highest of the router offers you direct and simple configuration of your community, with another primary choices for the mobile connection and different configurations. On the entrance fringe of the gadget there’s a gigabit ethernet LAN port and a USB 3.1 Gen-2 port that pulls double obligation, charging the M5 and serving as a USB tethering port. Flanking these ports are two coated TS9 ports for exterior mobile antennas, which aren’t included. It has textured, grippy flat sides and a detachable soft-touch backside cowl hiding the gadget’s mercifully replaceable 5040 mAh battery. A SIM card is secured beneath that.

The total bundle is pleasantly compact (for a router), and whereas I wouldn’t precisely name it pocketable, it’s shut sufficient that I might slip it principally into my hoodie pocket when shifting tables whereas out in public with it. That stated, it match fairly simply right into a compartment in my laptop computer case. Though it’s cumbersome for a hotspot, its size-to-performance ratio is genuinely spectacular. 

Wes Davis / IDG

What’s inside 

Its beating coronary heart is a Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 5G modem chipset, which is one technology older than the superb third iteration of the Snapdragon X60 modem that the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra carries inside its chassis. The X55 is a barely greater chip constructed with a 7 nanometer course of (in comparison with the X60’s 5nm) that isn’t fairly as environment friendly as its successor. It can also’t combination mmWave and sub-6 connections just like the X60—that’s, utilizing them concurrently for larger throughput—the truth is, the M5 doesn’t help an mmWave connection in any respect. Netgear has forgone this in favor of including extra 5G bands on this router. C-Band help is a key function right here, as the boundaries (and restricted availability) of mmWave imply that, on the entire, this router has extra alternatives for quicker throughput, because the C-Band is much much less vulnerable to bodily impediments, and will probably be far more accessible for the close to future. 

Netgear

Feature set 

The good factor a couple of hotspot is that they often include a touchscreen, which implies that, as long as your wants are primary, you could by no means need to fuss with the GUI or an app, which is sweet as a result of I discovered the Netgear Mobile app to be sort of buggy. In the case of the Nighthawk M5, you get that primary management after which some, with configurable band areas, data-and-battery-saving choices, output band choices, and extra. You’ll nonetheless have to dive into the app or internet GUI (I like to recommend the latter, right here) to do something extra difficult, however what’s accessible through the touchscreen continues to be extra complete than you’d count on, and that’s nice. 

As a router, the Netgear Nighthawk M5 is pretty elemental. It helps Wi-Fi 6—the interference-busting, IoT-friendly usurper protocol meant to take over from the ageing 802.11ac (now renamed Wi-Fi 5) customary—and by extension it additionally makes use of the brand new Wi-Fi safety customary WPA 3, which improves the safety of your Wi-Fi community most notably by rendering the complexity of your password largely irrelevant. The M5 additionally features a few safety features like internet filters, entry scheduling, and you’ll arrange port forwarding/filtering or configure which mobile band areas you’d like to hook up with, and it even helps VPN Passthrough and UPnP. 

Apart from the cellular-specific issues, these are all fairly customary options for an atypical router, however not essentially for a cell hotspot. Because of those options although, you would feasibly use the Netgear Nighthawk M5 as your solely connection to the web; whether or not you’d need to is a completely totally different query, in fact. It’s arduous to discover a cell plan that received’t severely throttle your connection after a sure set knowledge restrict, and the M5 prices way over routers with considerably higher efficiency. Of course, these are the issues of a metropolis slicker; for these sure to the highway or dwelling in rural areas, web entry is typically hardly higher than the unhealthy outdated days of dial-up. As 5G protection expands, nevertheless, switching from hardwired web or satellite tv for pc web to cellular-based entry often is the extra enticing choice, as demonstrated by the common 30Mbps obtain pace reported on, for example, T-Mobile’s standalone 5G community or 53.4Mbps on the quicker Non-standalone entry community, by cell analytics agency Open Signal in February of this year.  

Wes Davis / IDG

Performance as a broadband different 

To check the Nighthawk M5’s throughput, I ran TCP file switch exams from six factors in and out of doors my dwelling, testing throughput on the 5GHz band utilizing the Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) protocols, then on the two.4GHz band utilizing Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)—the latter is probably going for use by most of your IoT gadgets, and though it’s doable to make use of Wi-Fi 5 on the two.4GHz band, most router producers don’t help it. For my consumer gadget I used a Lenovo Yoga (2019) with an Intel AX201 Wi-Fi 6 NIC, whereas an M1 MacBook Air, hardwired with a Plugable 2.5Gbps USB-C-to-Ethernet adapter, stood in because the server. Each common was taken from six particular person exams at a given location. What I discovered was a router extra succesful than I anticipated, although it fell in need of being a substitute for the total community equipment that’s my doomed ISP-supplied modem-router combo and my Eero mesh system.  

Brad Chacos/IDG

Throughput in the identical room because the M5 averaged a formidable 651Mbps utilizing Wi-Fi 5, and 605Mbps with Wi-Fi 6. That is quick. By comparability, the one router that outperformed it at this vary was an Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 at 917Mbps, however that’s a big gaming router supposed for the best doable throughput, and is our high-water mark for many of the comparability testing on this evaluation.

Brad Chacos/IDG

The M5 outperformed all different routers examined (on uncooked throughput) at shut vary, together with an Eero Pro (2nd Generation), which got here in at 562Mbps on the Wi-Fi 5 protocol, and a Linksys EA9500 with a median 380Mbps at 3 toes. The story modified as we moved away from the M5, although, with its throughput dropping by greater than half on the 5GHz band on my entrance porch, with one exterior wall and 20 toes of open air within the intervening house. None of the opposite routers skilled wherever near that massive a drop in efficiency right here or wherever in my testing house on the 5GHz band, but it surely was in a position to keep above 100Mbps all over the place I examined inside my dwelling, whereas it failed to succeed in my yard with usable sign (the one approach I’ve managed to get any form of respectable sign again there’s to bounce it with a mesh system. 

Brad Chacos/IDG

Brad Chacos/IDG

On the two.4GHz band, the M5 was satisfactory indoors, however slower than all the opposite routers examined on most exams besides in my basement and upstairs space, the place it at the least outperformed the Asus router, which has poor ranged efficiency on the two.4GHz band, at the least the place the Wi-Fi 4 protocol is worried. 

That’s the intra-network efficiency—satisfactory, however not stellar, in a big house with many partitions; however in a extra applicable surroundings, is a 5G connection dependable sufficient to totally change a wired connection to an ISP? To check this, I ran a 2-hour connection check at testmy.net, set to ballot my connection each 5 minutes, as much as 24 instances. The outcome was a connection that did often dip under 100Mbps, however finally averaged 120.71Mbps, whereas my DSL connection by no means made it above 50Mbps (I’m at present paying for a 100Mbps plan). As I anticipated, there was much more deviation in throughput on the 5G downlink, but it surely was fairly a bit quicker than my comparatively creeping DSL, and that isn’t even utilizing a C-Band connection, which so far as I can inform, just isn’t accessible at my dwelling. 

In gaming, I wasn’t ready to hook up with different gamers on my Nintendo Switch—I stored receiving a NAT traversing error—however I discovered it surprisingly serviceable for some on-the-go Counter Strike: Global Offensive play; though, with ping hanging out round 100-140ms, you definitely received’t need to use it for aggressive play. According to Netgear, activating Universal Plug ’n’ Play fixes the Switch NAT difficulty, however I used to be sadly not in a position to get a distinct outcome on making that change. No on-line MarioKart for me, then. 

Overall, as a standalone entry level, the Nighthawk M5 might legitimately maintain its personal, however I wouldn’t suggest it in a house any bigger than, say 1,000 sq. toes, and possibly not for critical players. Unless… 

Curious, I changed my modem-router combo with the M5 and ran it on the head of my community, with Eero dealing with all the intra-network routing. After a day of testing—streaming 4K or HD video on three Apple TVs, listening to music on the three HomePods Mini positioned round my dwelling, enjoying video games, searching the web and swapping information between computer systems—I discovered the Nighthawk M5 greater than merely succesful: It dealt with the obligation of offering web entry to my complete community with aplomb. In truth, my community appeared extra secure, with fewer lengthy pauses and failed requests from sensible audio system than I’ve through my regular ISP. If not for the worth tag, I might strongly contemplate changing my DSL plan with an information plan utilizing this router. More on that choice, later. 

Wes Davis / IDG

Internet to-go 

Next, I satisfied my spouse to return with me to a close-by brewery to attempt the router out within the wild. While we had been there, related to the router with two telephones, an iPad, and three laptops, we streamed video, music, and surfed the web, and the Nighthawk M5 didn’t miss a beat. I carried out some extra throughput testing, and noticed some quite important throughput drops versus related testing circumstances at dwelling, however being inside a brewery, it’s probably there was important interference. Still, throughput throughout iPerf testing on the 5GHz band was properly in extra of 300Mbps, and my downlink bandwidth was sufficient to stream at-least-HD video on a number of gadgets. Given this expertise, it’s obvious why Netgear insists on calling this a cell router, quite than a hotspot—it might simply be utilized by a complete workplace working collectively in a public house with out counting on the usually insecure wi-fi connection of a enterprise or every utilizing their very own non-public hotspots.  

Wes Davis / IDG

Battery life 

Netgear claims as much as 13 hours of battery earlier than you should recharge the Nighthawk M5; I examined this assertion, and located it to be no tall story. In truth, it truly took 14 hours of lively use for me to fully exhaust the 5040mAh battery. That was with a number of gadgets related, typically streaming video or music, and pretty fixed web searching. In standby mode, the M5 battery life appears to stretch out into infinity, because it solely misplaced a single share level over a three-day interval whereby I left it sitting untouched on a shelf––I requested Netgear about this and was informed that of their testing, at pure idle, the M5 lasted 14 days, placing it within the territory of outdated function telephones for battery life. 

There isn’t so much on the market to check this gadget to proper now, however the Inseego 5G MiFi M2000, which boasts a lot of the identical function set and compatibility, has about the identical battery ranking (5050mAh, on this case) and runs with the identical chipset. It claims all-day battery life, however that’s pretty subjective, whereas a PC Mag evaluation put it at 11 hours. For the needs of this evaluation, we’ll assume it’s related sufficient to not actually matter.  

Bottom line 

I got here away from the Nighthawk M5 extraordinarily impressed. While I don’t suppose 5G is sort of able to be a full-blown different to a house web connection for most individuals, this piece of {hardware} is a superb glimpse right into a future free from the frustrations of our massive broadband firm cartels. The greatest impediment now appears to be the lumbering telecom giants, whose entry plans merely haven’t caught as much as the place the {hardware} appears to be. At the second, plans are harking back to the unhealthy outdated days of cell telephones, with knowledge caps and throttling and overage charges aplenty, with some providing limitless home-internet-style plans, however how they correlate to 5G protection is a thriller to me, as merely getting a 5G gadget doesn’t appear to be the one prerequisite (I attempted). 

Where the Netgear Nighthawk M5 actually falls flat is its value, although: for $700, you should purchase a very good router or mesh system—heck, for one-third of that value you may get an important router for many wants, and in case you’re the thrifty kind, decide up a used mesh system for even much less. Of course, the M5 doesn’t hit the identical market, but it surely doesn’t actually get higher in case you have a look at different 5G cell hotspots. In truth, in case you’re on AT&T, the predecessor MR5100 itself is almost $200 less regardless of being, for all intents and functions, the identical router. If you wished mmWave, the Inseego MiFi M2100 5G UW affords that (albeit with out the choice for a C-Band connection) for a hair under $400. Unlike these gadgets, nevertheless, the MR5200 is provider agnostic, and that C-Band compatibility goes to see much more use than an mmWave connection; so on stability, it is likely to be price the additional $200-$300 to some people. As they are saying, although, it’s too wealthy for my blood.