With its superior telephoto capabilities and an attention-grabbing 200-megapixel primary digicam, I wished Samsung’s Galaxy S23 Ultra to show Apple a lesson in how a flagship telephone ought to deal with digital pictures. Not as a result of I need Apple to lose, however as a result of I need competitors to enhance all people’s smartphone pictures.But although the S23 Ultra digicam specs look higher than the iPhone 14 Pro’s in some ways, I’m not going to declare it the higher possibility for photographers. Nor is Apple the clear chief. After capturing lots of of pictures and pixel peeping for hours, this race comes right down to what you worth most in smartphone cameras.If telephoto attain are essential to you, the $1,200 Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is the higher digicam, as you may inform from the picture beneath, and it handles evening pictures higher. If you are sticking with daytime photographs and are OK with a most 3x zoom, I choose Apple’s iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max, which begin at $999 and $1,099, respectively, for extra pure pictures and a cleaner, quicker digicam app.Read on to dig into the small print.Apple and Samsung have succesful wide-angle primary camerasNo matter your telephone, likelihood is good that you’re going to spend most of your time utilizing the principle, wide-angle digicam, the most effective one for photographing close by folks. These are the cameras with the most effective sensors and optics, for good purpose, and Samsung and Apple did not skimp on the {hardware}.Both telephones’ cameras can seize plentiful element and, with as we speak’s computational pictures expertise, an affordable vary of vivid and darkish tones. Under strange circumstances, neither telephone is head and shoulders above the opposite.I choose the iPhone, although. Frankly, each firms are responsible of overprocessing, however Apple much less so. Samsung’s intuition is to crank up the saturation so colours are tremendous wealthy so skies look unnaturally blue and grass unnaturally inexperienced. Samsung usually made the clouds of overcast skies too gloomy and grey. The Galaxy telephone sharpens edges so tree leaves, blades of grass and different areas with numerous element are a crispy, jittery mess. In the picture of the boats beneath, the S23 Ultra suffers from synthetic trying edges across the palm timber and jittery highway particulars within the foreground.If you are pictures on a telephone display screen, these vivid, punchy photographs look extra eye-catching. But I usually look on laptops too, the place the pictures seem to be an exaggerated model of actuality. I choose a bit extra fact to my pictures.Samsung’s face detection on the Galaxy S23 Ultra zeroed in on topics properly for good focus. The iPhone appeared to do what I wished in some tough pictures higher, although. In one comparability, it appropriately targeted on a toy block development, not the kid who created it who was sitting within the background. In quite a lot of related scenes, the Samsung went for the faces, each time.Another AI-boosted expertise is portrait mode, and right here I most popular Samsung’s expertise for higher separation of foreground and background. The iPhone typically would blur elements of the topic whereas maintaining different elements in focus.I just like the S23 Ultra’s potential to take 50-megapixel pictures, not simply the 12-megapixel default. Apple shoots solely 12-megapixel pictures which are simpler in your iPhone and iCloud storage limits however that do not supply as a lot element.The S23 Ultra has a considerably wider discipline of view, which is good for indoor pictures and a few landscapes. However, I choose Apple’s discipline of view. Both telephones have ultrawide cameras, in any case. In this courtyard picture, it is good to have a large discipline of view, however Apple provided a extra life like rendering of the scene.Low mild: The edge goes to SamsungWhen the going will get darkish, although, I most popular Samsung’s computational pictures abilities. The Apple pictures suffered extra from muddines in darkish areas, and Samsung typically did higher preserving particulars and boosting shadows that may have been misplaced to shaky arms. Note the sharper stenciled textual content and brighter shadows within the Samsung picture beneath.Below, the iPhone 14 Pro tried brightened the scene extra, however the particulars are far muddier than with the S23 Ultra. Usually the iPhone had extra life like pictures, however not this time.Both telephones failed on the difficult activity of capturing at evening towards a vivid streetlight, with huge, multicolored lens flare artifacts distracting from something within the picture. Sadly, that is the cutting-edge for smartphone pictures nowadays, and never simply with these to producers.Telephoto pictures: Samsung is approach higher, clearlyNot everybody ventures far past the principle digicam, however in my thoughts, giving folks extra photographic freedom is essential. It’s the principle purpose these flagship telephones price a lot extra. And I simply love the Samsung’s S23 Ultra’s 3x and 10x telephoto cameras. Telephoto pictures can tightly body distant objects, spotlighting particulars and views that may be extra stunning and interesting. Samsung’s Galaxy S23 Ultra’s 10x telephoto took this this picture of my canine within the snow. With my iPhone 14 Pro’s most 3x zoom, it might have been an extended snowshoe trudge to attempt to get shut sufficient. Stephen Shankland/CNETI took dozens of pictures to check the iPhone 14 Pro’s pictures upscaled to 10x with the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s native 10x pictures. Of course there isn’t any comparability. Over and over I acquired pictures of my canine off the overwhelmed monitor in deep snow, my child working away from waves on the seashore and different topics I could not simply stroll nearer to {photograph}, like this speaker at a convention. The Galaxy S23 Ultra’s native 10x telephoto digicam produced a much better shot than the iPhone 14 Pro’s digital upscaling from its 3x digicam. This reveals cropped variations. Stephen Shankland/CNETGiven how laborious Apple promotes its merchandise as artistic instruments, the dearth of a giant telephoto digicam on iPhones is embarrassing at this level.Samsung, like Google and different rivals, will get the lengthy attain with a “periscope” lens method that makes use of a prism to angle mild 90 levels contained in the telephone physique. That sideways bend accommodates the in any other case impractically lengthy telephoto optics. It’s a wise method, and one Apple ought to mimic.I used the Samsung at 10x so much and fewer generally with its digital upscaling expertise, at 30x and 100x. The 30x pictures could be helpful when seen small and will help with jobs like figuring out birds. 100x is generally a novelty until you are limiting your pictures to postage stamp dimension.S23 Ultra’s 200-megapixel pictures are a gimmickOne of the S23 Ultra’s headline options is a 200-megapixel mode. Sadly, as applied, I see it as lower than helpful. Through a picture sensor expertise referred to as pixel binning, Samsung assigns every 4×4 group of pixels to seize a single coloration in, successfully, one bigger and extra delicate pixel. The method works properly when taking low-light pictures at 12.5 megapixels. But that does not seize as a lot element when capturing at 50 megapixels or 200 megapixels, which requires the telephone to extrapolate coloration info.Indeed, at 200 megapixels, the sensor makes use of AI expertise to attempt to reconstruct the colour information. That, mixed with sharpness limits of tiny lenses, implies that 200-megapixel pictures actually did not appear to be any higher. In one check, I could not inform a lot distinction between a 200-megapixel shot and a 50-megapixel shot blown as much as 200 megapixels in Photoshop.The 200-megapixel pictures pictures are additionally humongous. For ones shot of a snow-covered cedar, the 200-megapixel JPEG is 57MB in contrast with 21MB for the 50-megapixel shot and 7.3MB for the 12-megapixel shot.The iPhone makes use of solely 2×2 pixel binning for 48-megapixel pictures, and with as we speak’s telephone tech, that is a very good most. I’d love for iPhones to supply 48-megapixel JPEG or HEIC photographs, although, to catch as much as Samsung. Selfie time: iPhone takes the prizeFor selfies, it was an in depth matchup. I most popular the iPhone for its extra life like rendering of colours and particulars like hair and beards. Both telephones struggled with my shadowed face within the instance beneath, however the Samsung turned the sky a bizarre, flat grey.When capturing portrait mode selfies — the place synthetic bokeh blurs the background due to computational pictures — neither selfie digicam dealt with flyaway hair properly. But I assumed Apple’s iPhone did higher general.Ultrawide: Apple wins on sharpnessI give the sting to Apple right here for its extra pure rendering of colours and for significantly higher sharpness towards the periphery of the body, however principally the cameras are an in depth match. As traditional, the Galaxy S23 Ultra made the skies too blue and the grass too inexperienced, although, and each telephones struggled with excessive lens flare capturing towards the solar.The ultrawide lens can also be used for macro pictures. I’m glad macro pictures has arrived on smartphones, however on each cameras, picture high quality degrades considerably past the central portion of the picture, so do not get your hopes up. I assumed Samsung saved its sharpness higher throughout the body, although, as within the birthday pie picture beneath. Both cameras overprocessed the effective construction of the flower beneath, however the Samsung went additional overboard.Shoot uncooked if you need the most effective picture high qualityRaw pictures protect extra of the unique picture info for higher enhancing flexibility on the subject of coloration and publicity, and I like to recommend capturing uncooked if you need the most effective pictures. Both the Apple and Samsung uncooked pictures — taking a web page from Google’s digicam playbook — make use of a “computational raw” method that really merges a number of pictures into one shot, making the most of the picture processing strategies that underpin typical JPEG and HEIC pictures.Shooting uncooked sidesteps most of my issues with typical Apple and Samsung pictures, particularly oversaturation, plasticky pores and skin and an excessive amount of readability — the distinction increase to a shot’s center brightness tones. I choose much less sharpening too, and the uncooked pictures let me dial it again, although not so far as I’d like with the S23 Ultra. I think Samsung is doing a little sharpening in its computational uncooked processing.When it involves capturing uncooked, Apple’s expertise is a lot better. You must allow the uncooked possibility within the digicam app’s codecs setting and, optionally, allow the complete 48-megapixel decision possibility for pictures taken with the principle digicam.Samsung, in distinction, treats uncooked pictures as one thing of an afterthought. You should obtain its separate Expert Raw app from its Galaxy Store. It’s a helpful app if you wish to fiddle with publicity, shutter pace and different settings whereas capturing, nevertheless it’s extra work for these of us preferring to simply take the picture and fiddle with it later in Lightroom or different enhancing software program. There’s no fast launch possibility for Expert Raw, both.You can set Expert Raw to avoid wasting each JPEG and uncooked variations of your pictures, however the JPEG’s rudimentary processing is way worse than the pictures from the common digicam app, with tear-inducing oversaturation and apparent halos ringing topics in contrasting vivid and darkish areas. Stick to uncooked solely. If you employ Samsung’s Expert Raw digicam app, you get uncooked pictures with far more versatile management over white steadiness and publicity, although sharpening seems to be baked in. The telephone processes the accompanying JPEG photographs crudely, as proven by the acute halo glow across the canine on this shot. Stephen Shankland/CNETMore annoying are the decision settings within the app. If you set the digicam to shoot in 50-megapixel mode, you may solely use the principle digicam. If you need to use the telephoto or ultrawide cameras, you must step again right down to 12 megapixels earlier than they’re accessible. There’s no possibility simply to shoot on the highest decision accessible with every digicam.There’s additionally no 200-megapixel uncooked possibility. Given its marginal picture high quality advantages, I’m undecided that is a giant drawback.Conclusion: No clear winnerThe Galaxy S23 Ultra’s telephoto cameras are costly parts, however price it if you wish to categorical your self creatively. Apple’s extra pure pictures and quicker, extra succesful digicam app are a significant asset, although.Either smartphone is a succesful photographic software, however neither is such a transparent chief that it is price shifting from Android to iOS or vice versa. If you need to get probably the most out of your telephone’s digicam, the simpler resolution is to start out capturing uncooked.
More